Thongjai v The Queen ; Chun-kong v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 05 August 1997 |
| Date | 05 August 1997 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
30 cases
-
R. v. Hodgson, [1998] 2 SCR 449
...rule, and therefore the trial judge had no duty to host a voir dire. Cases Cited By Cory J. Distinguished: Thongjai v. The Queen, [1998] A.C. 54; considered: Erven v. The Queen, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 926; referred to: R. v. Wells, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 517; R. v. A.B. (1986), 26 C.C.C. (3d) 17; Ibrahim......
-
R. v. M.C.H., (1998) 230 N.R. 1 (SCC)
...3 A.R. 524 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 38]. R. v. Sweezey (1974), 20 C.C.C.(2d) 400 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [paras. 41, 100]. R. v. Thongjai, [1998] A.C. 54 (P.C.), dist. [para. 51]. R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531; 113 N.R. 53; 41 O.A.C. 353; 59 C.C.C.(3d) 92; 79 C.R.(3d) 1, refd to. [para. 57].......
-
R. v. M.C.H., (1998) 113 O.A.C. 97 (SCC)
...3 A.R. 524 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 38]. R. v. Sweezey (1974), 20 C.C.C.(2d) 400 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [paras. 41, 100]. R. v. Thongjai, [1998] A.C. 54 (P.C.), dist. [para. 51]. R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531; 113 N.R. 53; 41 O.A.C. 353; 59 C.C.C.(3d) 92; 79 C.R.(3d) 1, refd to. [para. 57].......
-
Harold Berbick and Kenton Gordon v R
...his ruling.’ 82 This analysis remains unaffected, in our view, by the subsequent observation of the Board in Thongjai and Another v R [1998] AC 54, para. [8], which is a case in which the trial judge ruled the statements inadmissible after a voir dire, that ‘it is desirable that a trial jud......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Authenticating ‘Things’ in English Law: Principles for Adducing Tangible Evidence in Common Law Jury Trials
...was in police custody, since this298 THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOFAUTHENTICATING ‘THINGS’ IN ENGLISH LAW207 Thongjai vR[1998] AC 54 at 61.208 PACE, s. 82(1).209 RvMushtaq [2005] UKHL 25 at [14], [21], [43], [74].210 Ibid. at [48].211 If X makes a note of D’s oral confession,......
-
Subject Index
...ofInvestigation and Research) [1990] 1 SCR 425. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .242Thongjai vR [1998] AC54 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298TJC vR [2006] NSWCCA413. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287Tofilau vThe Queen [2007]HCA 39 . . . . . . . 69–7......
-
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
...to rule upon thenature of the statement, as to whether it was involuntary and thereforeinadmissible? As reported in Thongjai v R[1997]3 WLR 667, two casestried in separate courts, one case of murder and the other of drugtrafficking, came together before the Privy Council because they raised......