Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No. 3)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 April 1996
Date01 April 1996
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)

Commercial Court of the Queen's Bench Division

Before Mr Justice Clarke

Three Rivers District Council and Others
and
Governor and Company of the Bank of England

Tort - misfeasance in public office - requirements

Misfeasance in public office

A plaintiff had a sufficient interest to maintain an action of misfeasance in public office at common law where it was established (i) that the defendant was a public officer who intended to injure him and knew he had no power to do what he did and that the plaintiff would probably suffer loss and (ii) that the plaintiff had suffered loss as a result of the wrongful act.

Mr Justice Clarke so stated on a preliminary issue in the Commercial Court of the Queen's Bench Division.

The plaintiffs, Three Rivers District Council and others, were certain named depositors in Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA (in liquidation). BCCI was named as plaintiff as the assignee of the claims of the plaintiff depositors against the Bank of England.

Three questions arose: (i) was the defendant capable of being liable to the plaintiffs for the tort of misfeasance in public office; (ii) were the plaintiffs' alleged losses capable of being caused in law by the acts or omissions of the defendant; (iii) were the plaintiffs entitled to recover for the tort of misfeasance in public office as existing depositors or potential depositors?

Sir Patrick Neill, QC, Mr David Vaughan, QC, Mr Dominic Dowley and Mr Robin Dicker for the plaintiffs; Mr Nicholas Stadlen, QC, Mr Paul Lasok, QC, Mr Michael Phillips, Mr Bankim Thanki and Mr Rhodri...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
130 cases
  • Keegan v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 3 July 2003
    ... ... Lord Justice Ward ... Case No: B3/2002/2391 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ... 2 On 29 th January 1997 three armed men attempted to rob a post office at St ... That property belonged to Liverpool City Council, and Anita De La Cruz, Dean Metcalfe's mother, ... probably injure the claimant (c.f Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England (No. 3) ... ...
  • Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd Claimant/Respondent v (1) Temujin International Ltd (2) Temujin Services Ltd (3) Hakkisan Finance Corporation Ltd 1st Applicant (4) Myrzaly Ltd 2nd Applicant (5) Norgulf Holdings Ltd (6) Incomeborts Ltd (7) Tigerkhan Ltd 3rd Applicant Defendants
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 25 August 2008
    ...out fails, the court, may, as part of its management powers, consider the question of summary judgment. 3 8 In Three Rivers District Council and others v Bank of England (No.3) 4, Lord Hope explained that the difference between the test for an application for summary judgment and an applica......
  • Kennedy v Law Society of Ireland (No 4)
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 21 April 2005
    ... ... UNDER THE STYLE OF GILES J.KENNEDY AND COMPANY Applicant and THE LAW ... ' duty of care - Entitlement to damages - Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No 3) [2000] 2 WLR ... PLC & ANDAMAN RESOURCES PLC v MAYO CO COUNCIL 2002 1 IR 112 2002 1 ILRM 481 ANNS v ... 1998 1 IR 134 THREE RIVERS DISTRICT COUNCIL & ORS v BANK OF ENGLAND 2000 3 ALL ER 1 ... ...
  • Wireless Group Plc v Radio Joint Audience Research Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 16 December 2004
    ... ... Mr Justice Lloyd ... Case No: HC04C01071 ... Between The ... Each shareholder is entitled to appoint three directors and the Institute of Practitioners in ... Currently it has a contract with a company called Ipsos UK Ltd. It first had a four-year ... He also relies on article 2 of Council Regulation 1/2003 on the implementation of the ... of Lord Hope of Craighead in Three Rivers District Council v. Bank of England [2003] 2 AC ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Regulating the Conduct of MPs. The British Experience of Combating Corruption
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Political Studies No. 45-3, August 1997
    • 1 August 1997
    ...Council [1982] AC158, [1981] 1 All ER 1202, P.C.; Three Rivers District Council v. Governorand Company of the Bankof England (No. 3) [1996] 3 All ER 558. See also De Smith, Woolf and Jowell, Judicial Review ofAdministrative Action (5th edn, 1995) pp. 783± 785; Clark and Lindsell on Tort, (1......