Thrige v United Shipping Company Ltd
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1924 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Voss Peer v APL Co Pte Ltd
......This desirable vehicle was snapped up by a company called. Seohwan Trading Co Ltd of Seoul, Korea (‘Seohwan’) on 15 ...order: . . (1) on the true construction of the shipping documents, in particular. the bill of lading as exhibited at "PV-1" of ...instance decision of Thrige v United Shipping Company Ltd [1923] 16 Ll.L. Rep 198. which concerned a ......
-
J I MacWilliam Company Inc. v Mediterranean Shipping Company SA
...bill of lading would not merit falling under the admiralty jurisdiction. 45 In 1924, on the eve of the Hague Rules, Thrige v. United Shipping Company, Ltd (1924) 18 Ll L Rep 6 suggests that at any rate in England (for the position in the US, see below) the use of a straight bill of lading ......
-
JI MacWilliam Company Inc. v Mediterranean Shipping Company Sa (the Rafaela S)
...instead, emphasising that the document before the Board would work as merchants would expect a bill of lading to work. 11 Thrige v United Shipping Company Limited (1923) 16 Lloyd's Rep 198 and (1924) 18 Lloyd's Rep 6 is of interest because its progress through the English courts coincided w......
-
JI MacWilliam Company Inc. v Mediterranean Shipping Company SA ('The Rafaela S')
...Rep 104. Stag Line Ltd v Foscolo, Mango & Co LtdELR[1932] AC 328. Stettin, TheELR(1889) 14 PD 142. Thrige v United Shipping Co LtdUNK(1924) 18 Ll L Rep 6. Shipping Carriage of goods Bill of lading Cargo carried from Durban to Felixstowe and from Felixstowe to Boston and damaged en route Whe......
Request a trial to view additional results