Tinsley v Milligan

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeLord Keith of Kinkel,Lord Goff of Chieveley,Lord Jauncey of Tullichettle,Lord Lowry,Lord Browne-Wilkinson
Judgment Date24 June 1993
Judgment citation (vLex)[1993] UKHL J0624-2
Date24 June 1993
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
455 cases
  • Pang Mun Chung and Another v Cheong Huey Charn
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Quinn & Others v Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 4 July 2012
  • Chandrakant Patel v Salman Mirza
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 5 July 2013
    ...case of In re Great Berlin Steamboat Company (1884) 26 Ch.D 616. 42 The position is resumed shortly by Lord Browne-Wilkinson in Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340 at 374, where he stated that "the effect of illegality is not to prevent a proprietary interest in equity from arising or to pro......
  • Patel v Mirza
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 20 July 2016
    ...A central part of their judgments, and of Mr Mirza's argument, concerns the doctrine of reliance applied by the House of Lords in Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340 : see paras 17–20. That decision led to the Law Commission conducting a comprehensive review of the law of illegality and ma......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
19 firm's commentaries
  • Claims By Insolvent Companies Against Fraudulent Directors
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 27 July 2015
    ...of the court, with the exception of Lord Sumption, called for this issue and the authorities bearing on it (such as Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340) to be revisited in an appropriate future case (see Lord Neuberger at [15], Lord Mance at [34] and Lords Toulson and Hodge at Likewise, ther......
  • Forgery, Shams And The Defence Of Illegality In Property Transactions
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 16 September 2021
    ...in their entirety and therefore void. Secondly, from Patel v Mirza [2017] AC 467, Grondona and the discussion in Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340 on this issue, it is clear that property rights, including equitable property rights, can pass under an illegal contract even if that contract ......
  • Forgery, Shams And The Defence Of Illegality In Property Transactions
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 16 September 2021
    ...in their entirety and therefore void. Secondly, from Patel v Mirza [2017] AC 467, Grondona and the discussion in Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340 on this issue, it is clear that property rights, including equitable property rights, can pass under an illegal contract even if that contract ......
  • Why Is The "illegality" Defence Back In The Spotlight?
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 30 July 2020
    ...only worked if the defendant could show that the claimant had to rely on the illegality in order to bring the claim: Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340. In Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42, the Supreme Court decided that this approach was too In Patel, the claimant gave the defendant '620,000 t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
44 books & journal articles
  • Change of position and restitution for wrongs: 'ne'er the twain shall meet'?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 33 No. 1, April 2009
    • 1 April 2009
    ...Gorman: at 253. (43) The concept of 'illegality' by its very nature is hard to define, though it is clear from both Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340 and Nelson v Nelson (1995) 184 CLR 538 that it relates to claims which would run seriously counter to public (44) See Andrew Tettenborn, The......
  • CONTRACTUAL ILLEGALITY AND CONFLICT OF LAWS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1995, December 1995
    • 1 December 1995
    ...Quaere whether this aspect of the case requires reconsideration in the light of the House of Lords’ decision in Tinsley v. Milligan[1993] 3 W.L.R. 126. 122 [1995] 2 S.L.R. 466 at 473F. 123 [1995] 1 S.L.R. 394 at 410. 124 Theresa Chong v. Kin Khoon & Co. [1976] 2 M.L.J. 253 at 256, Federal C......
  • Contract Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2003, December 2003
    • 1 December 2003
    ...para 9.2 supra, with regard to partnership), MPH Rubin J considered the criticism of the House of Lords decision in Tinsley v Milligan[1993] 3 All ER 65, particularly by the High Court of Australia in Nelson v Nelson(1995) 184 CLR 538 (and see generally Phang, ‘Of Illegality and Presumption......
  • Illegality
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Vitiating Factors
    • 4 August 2020
    ...applies as against cases where it is rebutted by the equitable presumption of advancement. The latter principle holds that 292 [1993] 3 All ER 65 (HL) [ Tinsley ]. 293 Gorog v Kiss (1977), 78 DLR (3d) 690 (Ont CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused (1977), 18 NR 484 (SCC). See also Scheuerman ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT