Tobi v Nicholas

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1987
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Louis v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • 21 July 1997
    ...under section 16 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 was a statutory requirement which could not be waived: see Tobi v NicholasUNK ([1988] RTR 343). In the present case it was discovered that there was no signature on the certificate of service. But no submission was made that the analys......
  • Jarvis v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Leeds City Council v Hussain
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 23 May 2002
  • Jubb v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 25 October 2002
    ...as no copy of it had been served on the accused, and he relies upon section 16 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 and the case of Tobi v Nicholas [1988] RTR 343. 19 Secondly, it is submitted that the police were not entitled to require the appellant to provide a specimen of blood, and t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Preliminary Sections
    • 29 August 2015
    ...[1984] RTR 231, DC! 309 ...................................................................... Tobi v Nicholas [1988] RTR 343, DC! 42 ............................................................... Tomkinson, DPP v [2001] RTR 583, DC! 458 ................................................... ......
  • The Requirement to Provide Specimens
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Contents
    • 29 August 2015
    ...the conclusion he did reasonably and properly, they were entitled to decide that there was not”. Appeal dismissed. Tobi v Nicholas [1988] RTR 343, 1 July 1987, QBD (DC) Oral evidence that a breath analysis device was not available is evidence of that fact. A doctor’s certif‌icate of taking ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT