Torkington v Magee

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1902
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
59 cases
  • R v Kohn
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 28 June 1979
    ...has stolen, in other words appropriated that thing in action, then the offence is made out. 37 We refer to the well known passage in Torkington v. Magee (1902) 2 K.B. 427 in the judgment of Mr. Justice Channell which appears at page 430 of the report to see the force of the argument. It run......
  • North East Equity Pty Ltd v Proud Nominees Pty Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Associated Tractors Sdn Bhd v Woo Sai Wa
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1997
  • R (Murungaru) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 September 2008
    ...these concessions was at best dubious and the second was wrong. 44 The classic definition of a chose in action is that of Channel J in Torkington v Magee [1922] 2 KB 427: it is a personal right of property which can only be claimed or enforced by action, and not by taking physical possessio......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • The Trendtex Principle in Australian Law: Context and Recent Developments
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review No. 40-2, September 2016
    • 1 September 2016
    ...law upon the matter requires broad juristic consideration and decision by an appellate tribunal in the light of modern circumstances.” 29[1902] 2 KB 427. 30Ibid., 431. 31Rickard Constructions v Rickard Hails Moretti [2004] NSWSC 1041 [42] (McDougall J); Rio Tinto Exploration Pty Ltd v Graph......
  • The legal and commercial frameworks
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume I - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...personal rights of property which can only be claimed or enforced by action, and not by taking physical possession”: Torkington v Magee [1902] 2 KB 427 at 430, per Channell J; State of NSW v Bovis Lend Lease Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1045 at [80], per Einstein J; Owners of Strata Plan 5290 v CGS & C......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Property
    • 5 August 2021
    ...Toomer v Witsell, 334 US 385 at 402 (1948) ....................................................... 19 Torkington v Magee, [1902] 2 KB 427 .................................................................... 4 Toronto Standard Condominium Corp No 1487 v Market Lofts Inc, 2015 ONSC 1067 ...........
  • What is Property?
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Property
    • 5 August 2021
    ...Act , RSPEI 1988, c P-21, s 1(l). 2 Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act , RSC 1985, c B-3, s 71. 3 Ibid , s 2. 4 See Torkington v Magee , [1902] 2 KB 427 at 430. What Is Property? 5 bankruptcy, 5 yet it is a right in personam that would not be regarded as property in other contexts. When property......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT