Tote Bookmakers Ltd v Development & Property Holding Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1985 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Pittalis v Sherefettin
...was upon a contingency (i.e. election). 17The next point taken by the plaintiffs is based upon the decision in Tote Bookmakers Ltd. v. Development & Property Holding Co.Ltd. (1985) 2 WLR, 603. In that case the provisions of the lease were very similar to those with which we are concerned h......
-
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Roach [2006] EWCA Civ 1746 CIS 2482 2005
...” To that definition, I add the observation of Peter Gibson J in Tote Bookmakers Ltd v Development & Property Holding Co Ltd [1985] Ch 261 at [269] when, in the context of section 27 of the Arbitration Act 1950, he defined undue hardship as “hardship … not warranted by the 45. I do not acce......
-
Roach v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
...matter of fact in the particular circumstances." To that definition, I add the observation of Peter Gibson J in Tote Bookmakers Ltd. V. Development & Property Holding Co. Ltd. [1985] Ch 261 at 269 when, in the context of section 27 of the Arbitration Act 1950, he defined undue hardship as "......
-
Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd v Dyna-Jet Pte Ltd
...be irrelevant. The arrangement suits both parties. The reason why that is so in cases such as the present and in the Tote Bookmakers case [1985] Ch. 261 is because the landlord is protected, if there is no arbitration, by his own assessment of the rent as stated in his notice; and the tenan......