Touts les Justices del banke teign que si Tenant in taile ad issue 2. fits & enfeoff

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1664
Date01 January 1664
CourtCourt of Common Pleas

English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 338

DEL COMMON-BANK

Touts les Justices del banke teign que si Tenant in taile ad issue 2. fits & enfeoff

LXXVI. Touts lea Justices del banke teign que si Tenant in taile ad issue 2. fits & enfeoff le puiane del terre taile & morust, le puisne morust seisi del dit terra, son feme esteant enseint 1'eisne enter en le terre, & apres le issue est nee & re-enter il ne poit; car le eisne est remit & eins en son auncye droit devant que le issue rien avoit: Car donques ne fuit person capable per discent ne auterment. H. 1, 2. P. M.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • KT v L and R B and Anor HC WN
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 24 August 2010
    ...existed after 31 July 2008 when consent guardianship and interim parenting orders were made. There may have been unlawfulness between 1 May and 31 July 2008 and if so, both the birth mother, Ms Temple, and the Barrs were parties to that “unlawfulness”. But that is immaterial to the determin......
  • S v R
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 3 March 2010
    ...[70] Introduction 1 The appellant faced trial by jury before Judge P A Moran on three counts of sexual violation by rape between 1 January and 31 December 1993 (counts 1 – 3) and one count of sexual violation by rape between 1 January and 31 December 1995 (count 4). In relation to the three......
  • Bartrom Estate v Accident Compensation Corporation
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 5 August 2011
    ...by ABCL. That business commenced from the date of his redundancy, that is, from late February 2002. In the brief period between late February and 31 March 2002, ABC earned a net profit of $7402 but no shareholder-employee earnings were credited to Mr Bartrom in that financial 7 In the follo......
  • Dianne Joy Gibson v The Queen
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 17 August 2010
    ...premise. It is clear that the IRD form was referring to income tax returns for the financial years ending 31 March 1998 (the IR5 column) and 31 March 1999 (the IR3 column). So the wages of $1,257.95 earned as an employee of the pet centre were earned in the financial year beginning 1 April ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT