Trade and Transport Inc. v Iino Kaiun Kaisha Ltd (Angelia)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Year1972
Date1972

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
14 cases
  • Pioneer Shipping Ltd v B.T.P. Tioxide Ltd (Nema)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 16 July 1981
    ...own view rather than adopt that of the arbitral tribunal. My Lords, I think, with respect, that this is what Kerr J. did inThe Angelia [1973] 1 W.L.R. 210, and what Goff J. has done in the present case, and I think they were each wrong to do so. I respectfully question whether The Angelia w......
  • Pioneer Shipping Ltd v B.T.P. Tioxide Ltd (Nema)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 May 1980
    ... ... whereas the judge, with no knowledge of the trade, may interpret the clause in its literal sense ... is a question of fact": whereas, in The Angelia (1973) 1 Weekly Law Reports 210 , Mr. Justice ... ...
  • Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 March 1978
  • Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 14 February 1980
    ...law with minimal citation of authority. I am sure that most commercial judges have wished to be able to do the same (cf. Trade & Transport Inc. v. Iino Kaiun Kaisha Ltd. [1973] 1 W.L.R. 210, 232 per Kerr J.). In my opinion they can and 19 2. The case of Harbutt must clearly be overruled. I......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Force Majeure Clauses
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 14 June 2012
    ...89 at 96 10 (1998) Aust Contract R 90-095; (Supreme Court of Tasmania, 5-7 & 10 November 1997; 5 May 1998) 11 [1962] 1 QB 42 12 [1973] 2 All ER 144 13 (2008) Aust Contract R 90-274; [2007] NSWCA 235 14 (2006) 236 ALR 115 © DLA Piper This publication is intended as a general overview and......
  • COVID-19 – Issues Affecting Performance Of Contractual Obligations In Construction Contracts: A Comparison Between English And Malaysian Law
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 10 April 2020
    ...Greek Petroleum Co SA v Okta Crude Oil Refinery AD (No.2) [2003] EWCA Civ 1031. 11 Trade and Transport Inc v Iino Kaiun Kaisha Ltd [1973] 1 W.L.R. 210, 224–227. 12 Channel Island Ferries Ltd v Sealink United Kingdom Ltd [1988] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 323, Tandrin Aviation Holdings Limited v Aero Toy......