Transocean Drilling U.K. Ltd (Claimant/Appellant) v Providence Resources Plc

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Justice Moore-Bick,Lord Justice McFarlane,Lord Justice Briggs
Judgment Date13 April 2016
Neutral Citation[2016] EWCA Civ 372
Docket NumberCase No: A3/2015/0855
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date13 April 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 cases
  • Motortrak Ltd v FCA Australia Pty Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 30 April 2018
    ...in my view were of equal bargaining power and thus the clause is not to be construed contra proferentem against FCAA: Transocean Drilling UK Ltd v Providence Resources Plc [2016] EWCA Civ 372 at [19] – [21]. 113 The parties referred to the Court of Appeal decision in Kudos Catering (UK) Ltd......
  • Classic Maritime Inc. v Limbungan Makmur SDN BHD
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 June 2019
    ...Rep 38Sueton D Grant & Co v Coverdale Todd & Co (1884) 9 App Cas 470, HL(E)Transocean Drilling UK Ltd v Providence Resources plc [2016] EWCA Civ 372; [2016] 2 All ER (Comm) 606; [2016] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 51, CAWertheim v Chicoutimi Pulp Co [1911] AC 301, PCAPPEAL from Teare JBy a claim form the ......
  • Pinewood Technologies Asia Pacific Ltd v Pinewood Technologies Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 13 October 2023
    ...to nothing more than a mere declaration of intent” ( Transocean Drilling UK Ltd v Providence Resources plc (The GSF Arctic III) [2016] EWCA Civ 372, per Moore-Bick LJ at [27]). 83 Although I was not referred to any authorities dealing with the general approach to be taken by the court to t......
  • The Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust v Atos it Services UK Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 31 August 2017
    ...Moore-Bick LJ at para. [46]; Nobahar-Cookson v The Hut Group Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 128 per Briggs LJ at para. [19]; Transocean Drilling UK ltd v Providence Resources plc [2016] EWCA Civ 372 per Moore-Bick LJ at paras. [14] and [28]. 77 However, the words used must be clear and unambiguous......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT