Trenchard & Hoskins Case

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1657
Date01 January 1657
CourtCourt of Common Pleas

English Reports Citation: 124 E.R. 199

COMMON BANCK AND EXCHEQUER

Trenchard and Hoskins Case. 1

trenchakd and hoskins case.* Pluis de Trenchard & Hoskins Case quel comence devant Davenport pur le Plaintiff, que ceui parols for any act done by him ount reference solement al cest branch de Covenant in quel sont include, & iiemy al ascun auter. Primo, II mise pur foundacon de son Argument que cest Covenant est several in nature, matter, & damages 27 H. 8. 29. Savoy port covenant versus J. S. pur ceo que il Covenant que fuit seisie de bone estate in tiel terre, & que il doet assure ceo a luy, & pur ceo que ne fuit seisie de bone estate ne assure ceo a luy il port accon, & fueront al issue, & sur le Evidence appeirt que il avoit assure le terre, & fuit seisie de ceo, mes ne fuit de tiel value come il Covenant, sur que Fitzh. dit que le Plain-[186]-tiff avoit mistake son accon ; per que appeirt que coment ceux 3 choses fueront contein in un Covenant uncore fueront distinct in nature & damages. Et il cite 11 Rep. 27. & 28. & 5 Kep. 23. Ou. monstre le nature de several Covenants, & 14 H. 25. 6. ou est mise si un Covenant a infeoffee vous del Manner de D. & auxi adiseiser J. S. del Mannor de S. est bone pur le primer part & voyd pur le second, que monstre que sont several Covenants. Donque ceui Covenants eeant several ou cest clause, &c. vaer al touts les auters * Nota in B. R. Term' Case de Jones. Home fist conveyance sur le marriage son fits al use pur le purpose del fitz pur vy & apres al fern le fitz pur vy, & Covenant que al tempa, del feaaans del Indenture for any act by him done or suffered to be done il fuit seisie in fee, & que le fitz & sa feme injoyer'. Et ulterius que la terre apres mort le fits serra al feme durant sa vy del annual value de 100 1. Et fits morust, & Action de Covenant fuit port per les Executors le pier, & declaration sur eel Indenture pur breach de Covenant que la terre apres mort le fits ne fuit de tiel value. Les Defendants plead que pur ascun chose per lour Testator le pier fait ou suffer al contrary la terre fuit de tiel value sur que demurrer. Et jeo mesme argue le Case, & adjudge pur le Plaintiff. Car sont several Covenants & le restriction va forsque al ceo Covenant a que ceo fuit annex & nemy al Covenant pur value que en Caae de marriage fuit un principal chose intend & pur ceo les Covenants serront pris joyntment & severalment, Secundam subjectam materiam. 200 MICH. 4 CAR. IN COMMUNI BANCO LITTLETON, 187. Covenants? Et il semble que nemy. Subsequent Clause in darrein Covenant poet explainer les auters, mes ne controuler; pur la deux primer Covenants ils poient aver perfect notice de choses, & pur ceo Covenant absolutement; mes ou ascun Reversion ou Remainder soiet in le Roy, il ne poet aver Conisans, pur q ilg font prudenter a Covenant ceo per ascun act fait per eux; & pur ceo sur le nature del chose res ipsa loquitur, que ceo vaer mes solement al cast Covenant. Et il dit le bargain eeant sacundum subjectam raateriam voet prover ceo. Car sur le bargain pur son estate voet promise que avoit bone estate in Fee, que poet render absoluteraent; mes si soiet doct per la purchaser, comeut serra conus que nul Reversion est in le Roy ? pur ceo serra respond, jeo voile Covenant que nest per ascun act fait per moy, & il perform le primer Covenant en enfreinder le 3d. & pur ceo le 3d. Covenant nest idle; Car poet ee Reversion in le Corone, & uncore il poet faire bone conveyance al Purchaser, car poet ee fraudulent conveyance de Remainder ou Reversion al Roy, & uncore le vendicon del terre serra bone al Purchaser per Statute 27 Eliz. cap. 4. Co. lib. 11. 7. 4. a. Penning des Covenants alter le case si ceux parols avoyent ee in comencement des Covenants poent restrain touts lea auters, come si fuit per ascun act fait per luy ou si fuit al fine de touts les Covenants, poent aver retrospect al touts devant pur oonfirmer Tauter; Et Tauter Covenant a paier luy 10 1. per ann. il paier ceo coment Tauter ue faire les services, pur ceo que est independaut in le penning, auterment si avoit ee que il Covenant a paier pro servitio. Issint est mise la le Covenant de marriage pur luy de son file, & lauter Covenant a paier tant argent, &c. & il cite VVestin. 2. cap. 46. que est coment sur le Statute de Merton. Mes ou coinmencer clairae per graut ou Covenant, il aver solonque le Covenant 27 H. 6. 10. 6 Rep. 36. Finches Case, Est grand difference quant le clause de restraint est in un & tnesme le sentence, & quant il veignant in distinct sentence, Paach. 32 Eliz. B. R. Harris & Wings Case Roy 2. [187] seisie del Manuor de Chingley & autera terres la nient parcel del Mannor, grant le Mannor ove les Appurtenances & touts ses terres deitis le Manners, & touts terres a le Mannor aylors appurtenant, & rule que le terre nient parcel del Mannor passe. Et Roigne Eliz. seisie de deux Manners grant eux & touts terres deins les Marmora, & les terres appurtenant a les Mannors, & terres queux ne ftieront parcel del Mannor passe per le middle parols; & mesraa case fuit de Mannor de Stepney, touts queux cases fuerotit donque mise per Sir Edward Cooke, & agree per le Chief Justice Wray dee bone ley. Et monstre que ceo nest semble al Bosons Case 4 Rep ou tout est restrain per le parol (illam) & il mise Crafords Case in ceo Court ore tarde adjudge, quel vies devant. Brampston pur le Defendant. Que ceux parols doient referre al touts les auters Covenants. Le case depend sur construccon que doet ee collect hors del fait mesme, & touts rules per construccon des faits come que le relacon serra ad proximum ante- cedentem. Et que fait serra pris pluis fort versus luy que fist ceo sont dee intend si issiut le inteucon appeirt, & cost intencon poet ee collect hors de tout le fait, & tiel construccon serra fait que touts les parts del Indenture poent estoier, 2 Rep. 23. & 4 Rep. Nokes case, & 10 Rep. 64. Whistlers case, mes Tentencon serra le guide sole ment ou les parols sont subject al construccon, & si literal sence serra pursue in nostre case les parols admit un double construcon. Mise donque que avoit ee recite per le Indenture que cest clause serra annex al chescun des Covenants, & donque les Covenants soot in tiel manner, come sont, satis question le intencon recite serra pursue in le construccon, mes forreine intencon que ne appeirt in le fait nest dee regard, came in 8 Rep. Althams case 155. Icy Tentencon appeirt per tout le pre cedent...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Fearnley v London Guarantee and Accident Insurance Company
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 25 November 1879
    ...are inserted, " provided that the lessee shall not sub-demise," this is construed as a condition, and so in other cases. However, in Co. Litt., p. 203 (b), Lord Coke lays it down : " This word ' proviso' shall be also taken as a limitation or qualification, and sometimes it shall amount to ......
  • Doe dem. The Hon. Frederick Lumley against John Lumley Savile, Earl of Scarborough
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the King's Bench
    • 1 January 1835
    ...a decision which seems to turn on the principle that the reservation is a charge on the estate tail itself. So in Mr. Sutler's note to Co. Litt. 203 b. (n. 1, sect. 4), it is said, " Supposing A. to be tenant [17] for life, with the usual powers of leasing, jointuring, and charging; remaind......
  • Sorensen Estate v. Sorensen,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 18 February 1977
    ...interest in the properties to the son. As stated in Wharton's Law Lexicon (11th Ed.), "Jus accrescendi praefertur ultimae voluntati Co. Litt. 185b. - the right of survivorship is preferred to the last will." [45] Coming to the action for partition which it was contended severed the titles, ......
  • Tenille Hepburn v Adam Latiff Hepburn and Eleanor Lourenco So'Brien
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • High Court (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 15 January 2019
    ...most it effects a “severance for the time”, or “suspends” the joint tenancy pro tem. This is the view of Dixon, J, loc. cit.; and see Co. Litt. 185a, 318a, and Megarry and Wade, loc. cit., note 23, commenting on Coke's doctrine. It is not altogether apparent what is meant by a temporary sev......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Running aground in a sea of complex litigation: a case comment on the Exxon Valdez litigation.
    • United States
    • UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy Vol. 18 No. 1, June 2000
    • 22 June 2000
    ...Keeva, supra note 19. (42.) D. Alan Rudlin, Packaging Toxic Tort Cases For Trial; Use of Test Cases, Bifurcation and Class Actions, 406 PLI/LIT 185,276 (Mar. (43.) Stoll, supra note 7 (Stating that as a country, Exxon would be ranked as the 23rd largest economy in the world). (44.) Mark Cur......
  • REFLECTIONS ON THE NEXUS OF PROCEDURE AND HISTORY: THE EXAMPLE OF MODERN AMERICAN ARBITRATION.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 169 No. 8, August 2021
    • 1 August 2021
    ...within the field of critical legal studies). (9) Christopher Tomlins, Revolutionary Justice in Brecht, Conrad, and Blake, 21 LAW & LIT. 185, 204 (10) Christopher Tomlins, What is Left of the Law and Society Paradigm after Critique? Revisiting Gordon's "Critical Legal Histories", 37 LAW ......
  • Chicago Chapter's liaison meeting with Midwest Regional Appeals; February 15, 1995.
    • United States
    • Tax Executive Vol. 47 No. 3, May - May - May 1995
    • 1 May 1995
    ...are: Intangible Coordinator Telephone Franchises Clifford Jackson (312) 886-1046 Core Deposits John Conley (212) 264-3734 Generic Stephen Litt (203) 773-2070 3. If the National Office is required to approve such settlements, are there any specific criteria within which the National Office w......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT