Trotman v North Yorkshire County Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1999 |
| Year | 1999 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
40 cases
-
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (Publ), Singapore Branch v Asia Pacific Breweries
...Up to 1999, the English courts applied the Salmond test in its traditional formulation (see, eg, Trotman v North Yorkshire County Council [1999] LGR 584 (“Trotman”), where the English CA, applying the traditional formulation, held that a school was not liable for the indecent assault commit......
-
Lister and Others v Hesley Hall Ltd
...(1936), p 95; Salmond and Heuston, Law of Torts, 21st ed (1996), p 443) as interpreted and applied by the Court of Appeal in Trotman v North Yorkshire County Council [1999] LGR 584. The following passage in the judgment of Butler-Sloss LJ, at p 591, reveals the perceived difficulty: "18. H......
-
O'Keeffe v Hickey and Others
...1 IR 430, Moynihan v Moynihan [1975] 1 IR 192 and Crowley v Ireland [1980] IR 102 followed; Trotman v North Yorkshire County Council [1999] LGR 584 approved; Bazley v Curry (1999) 174 DLR (4th) 45, Jacobi v Griffiths (1999) 174 DLR (4th) 71, Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd. [2001] UKHL 22, [2002] ......
-
Delahunty v South Eastern Health Board
...v. Fawsitt [1986] I.R. 362; [1986] I.L.R.M. 639. Toal v. Duignan (No. 1) [1991] I.L.R.M. 135. Trotman v. North Yorkshire C.C. [1999] L.G.R. 584; [1999] I.R.L.R. 98. Ward v. McMaster [1985] I.R. 29; [1986] I.L.R.M. 43 (H.C.); [1988] I.R. 337; [1988] I.L.R.M. 400 (S.C.). Tort - Negligence - L......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Rough Justice in an Unjust World
...‘employer’ and ‘employee’ are more appropriate.4 (1957) 20 MLR 220, 231.5 See, for example, Trotman vNorth Yorkshire County Council [1999] LGR 584. Here, Butler-Sloss LJacknowledged that by a narrow application of precedent the plaintiff would receive no financialredress for the serious con......
-
The Treatment of Teacher v Calder in AG v Blake
...‘employer’ and ‘employee’ are more appropriate.4 (1957) 20 MLR 220, 231.5 See, for example, Trotman vNorth Yorkshire County Council [1999] LGR 584. Here, Butler-Sloss LJacknowledged that by a narrow application of precedent the plaintiff would receive no financialredress for the serious con......
-
The Close Connection Test for Vicarious Liability
...21 ed (1996) 443.31 Salmond & He uston on the Law of Torts 4 43. 32 Lister v Hesle y Hall supra para 20.33 Trotman v Nort h Yorkshire CC 1999 LGR 584 CA. 34 Rose v Plenty 1976 1 Al l ER 97.35 Supra.THE CLOSE CONNECTION TEST 455© Juta and Company (Pty) that these acts could ha rdly be seen a......
-
O'Keeffe v Ireland: The Liability of States for Failure to Provide an Effective System for the Detection and Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse in Education
...and Maxwell, 19th ed, 1987) 521–522; Canadian Pacific Railway Co vLockhart[1942] AC 591, 599.75 Trotman vNorth Yorkshire County Council [1999] LGR 584.James Gallen© 2015 The Authors. The Modern Law Review © 2015 The Modern Law Review Limited. 161(2015) 78(1) MLR is a close connection’ betw......