Trotman v North Yorkshire County Council

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Year1999
Date1999

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
31 cases
  • Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (Publ), Singapore Branch v Asia Pacific Breweries
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 19 May 2011
    ...Up to 1999, the English courts applied the Salmond test in its traditional formulation (see, eg, Trotman v North Yorkshire County Council [1999] LGR 584 (“Trotman”), where the English CA, applying the traditional formulation, held that a school was not liable for the indecent assault commit......
  • Lister and Others v Hesley Hall Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 3 May 2001
    ...(1936), p 95; Salmond and Heuston, Law of Torts, 21st ed (1996), p 443) as interpreted and applied by the Court of Appeal in Trotman v North Yorkshire County Council [1999] LGR 584. The following passage in the judgment of Butler-Sloss LJ, at p 591, reveals the perceived difficulty: "18. H......
  • O'Keeffe v Hickey and Others
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 19 December 2008
    ...1 IR 430, Moynihan v Moynihan [1975] 1 IR 192 and Crowley v Ireland [1980] IR 102 followed; Trotman v North Yorkshire County Council [1999] LGR 584 approved; Bazley v Curry (1999) 174 DLR (4th) 45, Jacobi v Griffiths (1999) 174 DLR (4th) 71, Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd. [2001] UKHL 22, [2002] ......
  • Delahunty v South Eastern Health Board
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 30 July 2003
    ...v. Fawsitt [1986] I.R. 362; [1986] I.L.R.M. 639. Toal v. Duignan (No. 1) [1991] I.L.R.M. 135. Trotman v. North Yorkshire C.C. [1999] L.G.R. 584; [1999] I.R.L.R. 98. Ward v. McMaster [1985] I.R. 29; [1986] I.L.R.M. 43 (H.C.); [1988] I.R. 337; [1988] I.L.R.M. 400 (S.C.). Tort - Negligence - L......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • The Close Connection Test for Vicarious Liability
    • South Africa
    • Juta Stellenbosch Law Review No. , September 2019
    • 5 September 2019
    ...21 ed (1996) 443.31 Salmond & He uston on the Law of Torts 4 43. 32 Lister v Hesle y Hall supra para 20.33 Trotman v Nort h Yorkshire CC 1999 LGR 584 CA. 34 Rose v Plenty 1976 1 Al l ER 97.35 Supra.THE CLOSE CONNECTION TEST 455© Juta and Company (Pty) that these acts could ha rdly be seen a......