Truman v London, Brighton, and South Coast Railway Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1883
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Low Kar Yit and Others v Mohamed Isa and Another
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Allen v Gulf Oil Refining Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 29 January 1981
    ...was thereby authorised to construct and operate the refinery which they in fact later constructed and operated (see London & Brighton Railway Company v. Truman (1885) 11 App. Cas. 45); and in acting as it did the company took and used the land for the sole purposes for which a power of comp......
  • Manchester, Lord Mayor, Aldermen and Citizens of the City of v Farnworth
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 28 November 1929
    ...I may mention Rex v. Pease, 4 B. and Ad. 30, Vaughan v. Taff Vale, sup. cit. Geddes v. Bann Reservoir, 3 App. Cas. 430, London & Brighton Railway Co. v. Truman, 11 App. Cas. 45, Hammersmith Railway Co. v. Brand, L.R. 4E. &I. 171. I mention these to show that I have carefully considered the......
  • Derrick Barr and Others v Biffa Waste Services Ltd [No 3]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 19 April 2011
    ...been taken to prevent the nuisance occurring: see (by way of example only) one of the typical Victorian railway cases, London, Brighton & South East Railway v Truman (1886) 11 App. Cas 45. 223 The modern application of this principle in nuisance cases began with the House of Lords decision ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT