Truman v London, Brighton, and South Coast Railway Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1883 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Derrick Barr and Others v Biffa Waste Services Ltd [No 3]
...occurring: see (by way of example only) one of the typical Victorian railway cases, London, Brighton & South East Railway v Truman (1886) 11 App. Cas 45. 223 The modern application of this principle in nuisance cases began with the House of Lords decision in Allen v Gulf Oil Refining Ltd [1......
-
Allen v Gulf Oil Refining Ltd
...construct and operate the refinery which they in fact later constructed and operated (see London & Brighton Railway Company v. Truman (1885) 11 App. Cas. 45); and in acting as it did the company took and used the land for the sole purposes for which a power of compulsory acquisition had bee......
-
Manchester, Lord Mayor, Aldermen and Citizens of the City of v Farnworth
...4 B. and Ad. 30, Vaughan v. Taff Vale, sup. cit. Geddes v. Bann Reservoir, 3 App. Cas. 430, London & Brighton Railway Co. v. Truman, 11 App. Cas. 45, Hammersmith Railway Co. v. Brand, L.R. 4E. &I. 171. I mention these to show that I have carefully considered the question, but I think it wo......
-
Coventry v Lawrence
...been assumed not to be a defence in Sturges v Bridgman 11 Ch D 852. And in London, Brighton and South Coast Railway Co v Truman (1885) LR 11 App Cas 45, 52, Lord Halsbury LC described the idea that it was a defence to nuisance as an "old notion … long since exploded" and he also said that "......
Request a trial to view additional results