Tshingumuzi v Attorney General of Natal

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtPrivy Council
Judgment Date1908
Date1908
Year1908

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Rex v Kalogeropoulos
    • South Africa
    • October 17, 1944
    ...(1902, A.C. 51), Rex v van Reenen (19 S.C. 332 & 388), Rex v van Reenen and Smit (20 S.C. 667) and Tshingumuzi v The Attorney-General (1908, A.C. 248) indicate that the Judicial Committee could exercise a power of Criminal Review over other superior courts in the Colonies as well as over th......
  • Rex v Noorbhai
    • South Africa
    • Appellate Division
    • October 17, 1944
    ..."By itself" it is not of great importance - cf. Tshingumuzi & Another v Attorney-General of the Colony of Natal Davis, A.J.A (1908), A.C. 248) - but, in the circumstances which are now under consideration, it does not stand alone and should not be left out of For these reasons the accused i......
  • Rex v Nxumalo
    • South Africa
    • September 26, 1939
    ...Privy Council in refusing leave to appeal from a conviction by the Native High Court in Tshingamazi v Attorney-General of Natal (L.R. 1908, A.C. p. 248). In that instance the Judicial Committee adopted a rule laid down in In re Dillet (L.R. 12 A.C. p. 459), which was a case tried before a j......
  • Rex v Noorbhai
    • South Africa
    • October 17, 1944
    ..."By itself" it is not of great importance - cf. Tshingumuzi & Another v Attorney-General of the Colony of Natal 1945 AD p81 Davis, A.J.A (1908), A.C. 248) - but, in the circumstances which are now under consideration, it does not stand alone and should not be left out of For these reasons t......
  • Get Started for Free