TTMI Sarl v Statoil ASA (The "Sibohelle")
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2011 |
| Year | 2011 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Heytex Bramsche GmbH v Unity Trade Capital Ltd
...Endustri AS v Sometal SAL [2010] EWHC 29 (Comm), [2010] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 661; TTMI SARL v Statoil ASA [2011] EWHC 1150 (Comm), [2011] 2 Lloyd's Rep 220.” vi) Moreover, had they been made available, Heytex would have read at Clause 3.7 of the Norms, that UNITY “ may issue, LC … under the F......
-
Barrier Ltd v Redhall Marine Ltd
...clear that the parties intended to incorporate the arbitration clause. 26 Christopher Clarke's approach was followed by Beatson J in TTMI SARL v Statoil [2011] EWHC 1150 (Comm) where he said at paragraph 51: Mr MacDonald Eggers relied on Habas Sinai Ve Tibbi Gazlar Isthisal Endustri AA v So......
-
Apex Energy International Pte Ltd v Wanxiang Resources (Singapore) Pte Ltd
...a deal recap merely recapitulates the terms of the agreement. In TTMI Sarl v Statoil ASA (“The Sibohelle”) [2011] EWHC 1150 (Comm); [2011] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 220, Beatson J pointed out (at [27]) in the context of shipping contracts that “it is common for charterparties to be concluded by an exch......
-
G-Fuel Pte Ltd v Gulf Petrochem Pte Ltd
...a deal recap merely recapitulates the terms of the agreement. In TTMI Sarl v Statoil ASA (“The Sibohelle”) [2011] EWHC 1150 (Comm); [2011] 2 Lloyd's Rep 220, Beatson J pointed out (at [27]) in the context of shipping contracts that “it is common for charterparties to be concluded by an exch......