Turkington and Others (Practising as McCartan Turkington Breen) v Times Newspapers Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Northern Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 23 October 1998 |
| Date | 23 October 1998 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Northern Ireland) |
- Mitigation - Duplication of damages - Plaintiffs recovering damages in respect of publication of words to same effect as words on which action founded - Trial judge's direction to jury - Whether direction given to jury sufficient - Aggravated damages - Whether unfairness or inaccuracy of report increasing hurt to plaintiff's feelings - Amount of award - Whether excessive - Proportionality - Defamation Act (Northern Ireland), 1955, s. 7, Sch., para. 9 -Defamation Act (Northern Ireland), 1955, s. 12.
The respondents were partners in a firm of Belfast solicitors who brought an action for damages for libel contained in an article in the issue of The Times published on 24 January, 1995. Several allegations were made in the article about the respondents' conduct of the defence of Private Lee Clegg in Belfast Crown Court and of the latter's subsequent appeal to the Court of Appeal. The material part of the article of which the respondents complained purported to be a report of a press conference held the previous day, at which statements were made about the respondents' conduct of Private Clegg's defence which reflected adversely upon their professional competence. Admission to the press conference was restricted to press representatives or persons specifically invited. At the trial of the action the appellant, the printer and publisher of The Times newspaper, did not dispute that the words written were defamatory of the respondents and abandoned the plea of fair comment contained in the original version of its defence. The sole ground of defence, apart from the issue of the amount of damages, was that the article was protected by the statutory qualified privilege of newspapers contained in s. 7 of the Defamation Act (Northern Ireland), 1955, (the 1955 Act). The trial judge ruled that the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Turkington and Others (Practising as McCartan Turkington Breen) v Times Newspapers Ltd
...decision, which are set out below. 2 The Facts 3The lucid and comprehensive judgment of the Court of Appeal delivered by Carswell LCJ ( [1998] N.I. 358) gives a full account of the facts giving rise to this appeal as understood by that court. I give only the barest summary needed to unders......
-
Proinsias de Rossa v Independent Newspapers Plc
...v. Associated Newspapers Ltd. (No. 2) [1965] 2 Q.B. 86; [1964] 3 All E.R. 947. McCartan Turkington & Breen v. Times Newspapers Limited [1998] N.I. 358. McDonagh v. News Group Newspapers Ltd. (Unreported, Supreme Court, 23rd November, 1993). Murphy v. I.R.T.C. [1997] 2 I.L.R.M. 467. Phillips......
-
De Rossa v Independent Newspapers Ltd
...TELEVISION NEW ZEALAND LTD V QUINN 1996 3 NZLR 24 CRAMPTON V NUGAWELA 1996 41 NSWLR 176 MCCARTON TURKINGTON & BREEN V TIMES NEWSPAPERS LTD 1998 NI 358 Synopsis Defamation Libel; damages; plaintiff awarded £300,000 in damages by the High Court; whether damages excessive; whether larger award......
-
Turkington et al. v. Times Newspapers Ltd.,
...which are set out below. The Facts [2] The lucid and comprehensive judgment of the Court of Appeal delivered by Carswell, L.C.J. ([1998] N.I. 358) gives a full account of the facts giving rise to this appeal as understood by that court. I give only the barest summary needed to understand th......