Turley v Allders Department Stores Ltd

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Date1980
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Hayes v Malleable Working Men's Club and Institute
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • Invalid date
  • Webb v Emo Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (Case C-32/93)
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • 14 February 1990
    ...on the ground of sex. There were two conflicting decisions of the appeal tribunal: Turley v Allders Department Stores LtdICR ((1980) ICR 66) and Hayes v Malleable Working Men's Club and InstituteICR ((1985) ICR 703). The majority in Turley's case found that since a man could not become preg......
  • Webb v Emo Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (Case C-32/93)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 19 October 1995
    ...is pregnant, for that is impossible. This led a majority of the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Turley v. Allders Department Stores Ltd. [1980] I.C.R. 66 to hold that dismissal of a woman on the pure ground of pregnancy could not constitute unlawful discrimination, comparison with a man who w......
  • Harriton v Stephens
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 9 May 2006
    ...treatment with the treatment which an employee of the other sex would have received in similar circumstances 190. 98 In Turley v Allders Department Stores Ltd191 Bristow J, applying the statutory formula, held that claims for relief under the SDA by women who had been dismissed from their e......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Pregnancy, Equality and the European Court of Justice: Interrogating Gillespie
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Discrimination and the Law No. 3-2, September 1998
    • 1 September 1998
    ...notion of equality, its limita-tions and alternative conceptions of equality, see Smith (1993). 1314 Case C-342/93, [1996] IRLR 214.5 [1980] ICR 66. See SDA s 1(1)(a): `A person discriminates against awoman. ..if on the grounds of her sex he treats her less favourablythan he treats or would......
  • Direct Discrimination without a Comparator? Moving to a Test of Unfavourable Treatment
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 43-1, March 2015
    • 1 March 2015
    ...on the basis that men were unable to become pregnant and so there was no available comparator: see Turley v Allders Department Stores Ltd [1980] ICR 66, 70 (Bristow J). Later courts found a comparator, but only by comparing the complainant to a sick male: see, for instance, Webb v EMO Air C......
  • Sexual Orientation Discrimination after Grant v South‐West Trains
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 63-5, September 2000
    • 1 September 2000
    ...approach is best seen by comparing them to the early (and now clearly wrong)English decisions in Turley vAllders Department Stores [1980] ICR 66 and Hayes vMalleableWorking Men’s Club and Institutue [1985] ICR 703.51 Compare, eg P. Brest, ‘In Defense of the Anti-Discrimination Principle’ (1......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT