Twentieth Century Fox Film Corpn v Newzbin Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2010] EWHC 608 (Ch)
Date2011
Year2010
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
32 cases
  • Whitby Specialist Vehicles Ltd v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division (Patents Court)
    • 17 December 2014
    ...The principles concerning joint tortfeasance were reviewed by Kitchin J (as he then was) in Twentieth Century Fox Corp v Newzbin Ltd [2010] EWHC 608 (Ch), [2010] FSR 21, where he concluded at [108]: "I derive from those passages that mere (even knowing) assistance or facilitation of the pri......
  • Dramatico Entertainment Ltd and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 20 February 2012
    ...Ltd was found by Kitchin J to have infringed the claimants' copyrights on a large scale: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp v Newzbin Ltd [2010] EWHC 608 (Ch), [2010] FSR 21 (" 20C Fox v BT"). He granted an injunction against Newzbin Ltd to restrain further infringements of the claimants' copy......
  • EMI Records Ltd and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 28 February 2013
    ...Kitchin J (as he then was) to have infringed the claimants' copyrights on a large scale: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp v Newzbin Ltd [2010] EWHC 608 (Ch), [2010] FSR 21 (" 20C Fox v Newzbin"). He granted an injunction against Newzbin Ltd to restrain further infringements of the claimants'......
  • Omnibill (Pty) Ltd v Egpsxxx Ltd ((in Liquidation)) and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
    • 17 November 2014
    ...Kitchin J as he then was considered the ambit of the tort of authorisation under s16 of the 1988 Act in Twentieth Century Fox v Newzbin [2010] EWHC 608 at paragraphs 85–95. Having considered the authorities, Kitchin J summarised the test in paragraph 90 as follows: In my judgment it is clea......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
2 books & journal articles
  • REVISITING AUTHORISATION LIABILITY IN COPYRIGHT LAW
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2012, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...(2005); Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman License Holdings Ltd(2005) 220 ALR 1; Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp v Newzbin Ltd[2010] FSR 21; and Dramatico Entertainment Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd[2012] EWHC 268 (Ch). 42 [1997] 2 SLR(R) 113 (CA). See, in particular, [35], wh......
  • A LOOK BACK AT PUBLIC POLICY, THE LEGISLATURE, THE COURTS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF COPYRIGHT LAW IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2012, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...The Straits Times (14 December 2011). 126[1988] AC 1013. For more recent UK cases, see Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp v Newzbin Ltd[2010] FSR 21. “[T]hat authorise means the grant or purported grant of the right to do the act complained of. It does not extend to mere enablement, assistance......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT