Uber BV v Aslam
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Neutral Citation | UKEAT/56/17 |
| Date | 2017 |
| Year | 2017 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
The Independent Workers Union of Great Britain v Central Arbitration Committee
... ... Some Riders are also signed up with other food delivery organisations such as Uber Eats, and Deliveroo does not object to this —… The Union does not believe that it is a vast majority, but accept a goodly proportion may ... attributes of substitutes (see clause 8.2 of the New Contract, set out para 16 above), nor is the absence of an obligation to work (see Uber v Aslam [2018] ICR 453 at para 27). However I agree with Mr Jeans that the Strasbourg case law does not support Mr Hendy's submission that the Riders are ... ...
-
Independent Workers Union of Great Britain v Central Arbitration Committee
...regime can and often does form part of the factual matrix for determining worker status in any particular case, as HHJ Eady QC held in Uber v Aslam UKEATT/0056/17/DA, the weight to be attached to such a factor is supremely a matter for the fact-finding tribunal, here the CAC. It addressed t......
-
Mrs N Sejpal v Rodericks Dental Ltd: 2201408/2019
...[2018] UKEAT 0173/17/2301; Uber BV 10.7 Reserved Judgment with reasons – rule 62 8 Case No: 2201408/2019 and others v. Aslam and others, [2018] ICR 453; and Stuart Delivery Ltd v. Mr Warren Augustine, The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Leyland & Ors v. Hermes, ET/1800575/2017, a......
-
Ms J Varnish v British Cycling Federation T/a British Cycling and UK Sports Council T/a UK Sport: 2404219/2017
...v Clyde & Co LLP & Anor [2014] ICR 730 UKSC • FNV Kunsten Informatie en Media v Staat der Nederlanden [2015] All ER (EC) 387 • Uber BV & Ors v Aslam & Ors [2018] ICR 453 EAT • Addison Lee Ltd v Gascoigne UKEAT/0289/17 • Addison Lee v Lange & Ors UKEAT/0037/18 • Pimlico Plumbers Ltd &......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
The Economic Sociology of Labour Law
...International Labour Or ganization (ILO),Declaration of Philadelphia (1944).7 See, for example, Uber BV v. Aslam [2018] ICR 453; Addison Lee v. Lange and OrsUKEAT/0037/18; Autoclenz v. Belcher [2011] ICR 1157.8 M. Freedland, `General Introduction' in The Contract of Employment, ed. M.Freedl......