Ultzen v Nicols
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1894 |
| Year | 1894 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
- Mervyn Linton v Donald Haynes and Samuel Facey
-
Morris v C. W. Martin & Sons Ltd
...I visit a friend's house and leave my coat with his servant in the hall, so that by friend becomes a gratuitous bailee of it, see Ultzer v. Nicola, 1894, 1 Queen's Bench, p. 92. On my departure, I find my coat has gone. The servant who was entrusted with it has stolen it without my friend'......
-
Reaper v Vrsecky (Trustee), in the matter of Reaper
...and thereby constitute it a bailee: Pollock and Wright, Possession in the Common Law (1888) Clarendon Press at 57, 163; Ultzen v Nicols [1894] 1 QB 92; Morris v CW Martin & Sons Ltd [1966] 1 QB 716 at 725. Thirdly, a bailee with duties analogous to those of a bailee for reward, is liable if......
-
Netta Patricia Danchevsky (Plaintiff) v Bohdan Danchevsky
...Justice Roxburgh in the case of Alliance Building Society v. Austen (1951) 2 Times Law Reports 1231 following Lacon v. De Groat (1893) 10 Times law Reports 25. But it is unnecessary to go into that second point; because the first point is sufficient for the case. A man cannot be punished tw......
1 books & journal articles
-
KHATOUN V. HOLLAND WEST AFRICA LINES & ANOR
...REFERRED TO IN JUDGMENT: 1. Turner v. Stallibrass (1898) 1 Q.B. 561; 67 L.J. Q.B. 52; 77 L.T. 482; 46 W.R. 81; 42 Sol. Jo. 65. 42 W.R. 58; 10 T.L.R. 25; 38 Sol. Jo. 26. 3. Coggs v. Bernard (1703) 2 Ld. Raym. 909; 1 Corn. 133; Holt, K.B. 131; 3 Salk. 11; 92 E.R. 107. 4. Woods v. Martin's Ban......