A v A (Maintenance Pending Suit) (No 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2001 |
| Year | 2001 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
-
G v G (Maintenance Pending Suit: Legal Costs)
...applied. Cases referred to in judgmentA v A (maintenance pending suit: provision for legal costs) [2001] 1 FCR 226, [2001] 1 WLR 605, [2001] 1 FLR 377. Airey v Ireland (1979) 2 EHRR 305, [1979] ECHR 6289/73, ECt Bacon (MC) Ltd, Re [1991] Ch 127, [1990] 3 WLR 646. Baker v Baker[1996] 1 FCR 5......
-
McFarlane v McFarlane ; Parlour v Parlour
...applied. Cases referred to in judgmentsA v A (maintenance pending suit: provision for legal costs) [2001] 1 FCR 226, [2001] 1 WLR 605, [2001] 1 FLR 377. Boylan v Boylan [1988] FCR 689, [1988] 1 FLR Campbell v Campbell[1998] 3 FCR 63, [1998] 1 FLR 828, CA. Cordle v Cordle[2001] EWCA Civ 1791......
-
Moses-Taiga v Taiga
...of the inclusion of legal costs in the quantification of the alimony pending suit. He suggests that the decisions of Holman J in A and A [2001] 1 FLR 377, and the decision of Charles J in G and G [2003] 1FLR 71 are wrongly decided. He relies on my judgment in Wermuth v Wermuth [2003] 1 FLR ......
-
Ben Hashem v Al Shayif
...required the husband to pay the wife's costs in the sum of £13,500 and (see A v A (Maintenance Pending Suit: Provision for Legal Fees) [2001] 1 FLR 377) a further £12,000 towards her future litigation costs. No payment has ever been made by the husband under that order and as at the date of......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Financial Remedies
...(Fam), [2013] 1 FLR 1173. 80 Civil Partnership Act 2004, Sch 5, Part 8. 81 A v A (Maintenance Pending Suit: Provision for Legal Fees) [2001] 1 FLR 377; Currey v Currey [2006] EWCA Civ 1338, [2007] 1 FLR 946; Re S (Child: Financial Provision) [2004] EWCA Civ 1685, [2005] 2 FLR 94; G v G [200......