A v National Blood Authority and Another (No. 1)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2001] EWHC 446 (QB)
Date2001
Year2001
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
29 cases
  • TV Media Pte Ltd v De Cruz Andrea Heidi and Another Appeal
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 8 July 2004
    ...manifestly too low in the circumstances. 179 Andrea brought our attention to the United Kingdom case of A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289; 60 BMLR 1 at [279], where the plaintiff, a 56-year-old lady, suffered from cirrhosis of the liver and underwent a liver transplant operat......
  • Anthony Frederick Wilkes v Depuy International Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 6 December 2016
    ... ... Mr Justice Hickinbottom ... Case No HQ15P02664 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ... Broadly, the relevant regulatory authority, applying its own scientific and medical expertise, will ... surgery (including hips) are collected by the National Joint Registry ("the NJR"), which publishes an annual ... the monumental judgment of Burton J in A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289 (" A v NBA ") in this ... when the product was supplied by its producer to another; and nothing in this section shall ... ...
  • Rosaleen Kennedy+jean Black V. The Lord Advocate
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 5 February 2008
    ...history of the identification and naming of the Hepatitis C virus is summarised in A and others v National Blood Authority and another [2001] 3 All E R 289, (per Burton J. at pages 300-1). Around 1990 Mr. Black was diagnosed as suffering from Hepatitis C. [7] When Mr. Black died a post-mort......
  • Karl John Chadwick V. Continental Tyre Group Limited
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 8 February 2008
    ...in the law of delict. Fault required to be eliminated from any consideration whatsoever. [11] In A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289 Burton J, in considering the liability of the defendants for infected blood or blood products, went straight to the Directive itself. At p 297e-j......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
7 books & journal articles
  • Autonomy and the Law of the Faster Horse: In Response to the Adoption of Autonomous Vehicles, What Aspects of the Australian and Irish Legal Liability Frameworks Require Reform?
    • Ireland
    • Hibernian Law Journal No. 21-2022, July 2022
    • 12 July 2022
    ...PLD art 6; implemented through s 5 of the Liability for Defective Products Act 1991 (Ireland) s 5; A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289 considering Consumer Protection Act 1987 (UK) s PLD art 6. This was implemented in Ireland through s 5 of the 1991 Act. PLD art 1; Liability fo......
  • Portrait of development risk as a young defence.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 59 No. 4, June - June 2014
    • 1 June 2014
    ...[emphasis added]). (55) See ibid. At the time Justice Burton was deliberating on A and others v National Blood Authority and another ([2001] EWHC 446 (QB), [2001] 3 All ER 289 (QBD) [A and others]), he was well aware of the German Mineralwasserflasche case, and to some degree borrowed the n......
  • Liability for Products in the Consumer Protection Bill 2006: A Comparative Critique
    • South Africa
    • Juta Stellenbosch Law Review No. , May 2019
    • 27 May 2019
    ...that, because of thestrict quality guidelines that are followed in blood transfusion services,68See, eg, A v National Blood Authority 2001 3 All ER 289. This contrasts with the US where ‘‘bloodshield’’ laws have been passed in most States to the effect that blood and blood derivatives are n......
  • Proprietary Rights in Human Tissue
    • Ireland
    • Hibernian Law Journal No. 12-2013, January 2013
    • 1 January 2013
    ...Liability to Recipients of HIV Contaminated Blood” (1992) 18 Dayton Law Review 87; A and Others v National Blood Authority and Another [2001] 3 All ER 289; this case made legal history in the United Kingdom for being the f‌irst case to succeed against the producer of a medical product. 06 V......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT