E v E (Non-molestation order)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 03 January 1994 |
| Date | 03 January 1994 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
Court of Appeal
E
and
E (Non-molestation order)
Husband and wife - no ouster order - rape
No ouster after rape
Where it was proved before a court of competent jurisdiction that a husband had either raped or attempted to rape his wife, an order to oust the husband from the matrimonial home would normally follow. But where the wife had indicated in evidence in chief that she did not necessarily wish the husband to leave the home, it was within the judge's discretion to make an order barring the husband...
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Paul Ian Hose
...specimen counts have been prepared. This has already been decided by another constitution of this court in R v Crutchley and Tonks, (Times 3 January 1994), but in that case there was no acceptance by the defendant's counsel that the court could have regard to matters other than those contai......
-
El Ajou v Dollar Land Holdings Plc
...the rights of a third party. Mr Justice Robert Walker so held, on a remission to the Chancery Division by the Court of Appeal (The Times January 3, 1994; (1994) 2 All ER 685) for the purpose of decision on quantum, of an action by the plaintiff, Mr Abdul Ghani El Ajou, against Dollar Holdin......
1 books & journal articles
-
Damned if she does, damned if she doesn't: de-legitimization of women's agency in Commonwealth v. Woodward.
...older parents have the capacity to care for young children. See Alvin Rosenfeld, M.D., Letter to the Editor, The Older Mother, N.Y. TIMES, Jan. 3, 1994, at A22 (calling for empirical research). Women over forty who seek become pregnant have also been criticized because, compared to younger ......