Verrall v Farnes
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1966 |
| Date | 1966 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
6 cases
-
Cordle v Cordle
...The policy behind section 2 when it appeared in the Agricultural Holdings Act, 1946, was referred to by Cross J. in Verrall v Farnes [1966] 1 W.L.R. 1254 at 1269 as follows:— "After all, one of the objects of the Act of 1948, as I understand the matter, was to give security of tenure to tho......
-
Well Barn Farming Ltd v Backhouse and Another
...Law of Landlord and Tenant which consisted of the annotations to section 2 of the 1986 Act. Mr Purves responded by citing Verrall v Farnes [1966] 1 WLR 1254 as showing that the consideration for the agreement need not take a monetary form. I have also reminded myself of the facts of Mitton ......
-
Bahamas International Trust Company Ltd and Another v Joel Threadgold
...What is the criterion? 30 In the present case, as I read the learned judge's judgment, he assumed, on the basis of his understanding of Verrall v. Fames (1966 1 Weekly Law Reports 1254), to which I shall return later, that once the opening words of the sub-section were satisfied, the sub-se......
-
Harry Edward Mitton and Harold Elijah Bradfield (Executors of the Will of Kenneth Archer Harvey Arnold, deceased) (Plaintiffs (Respondents) Arthur Ernest Farrow (Sued as Mr. A. E. Farrow) (Defendant (Appellant)
...the meaning of the section; that is to say, was he a licensee for consideration? 27 Rather similar considerations arose in the case of Verrall v. Farnes, reported in (1966) 2 All England Reports, 808. In that case the defendant had formerly been employed by the plainer tiff as his cowman. ......
Get Started for Free
