VT (Article 22 Procedures Directive – Confidentiality) Sri Lanka

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeUpper Tribunal Judge Canavan
Judgment Date19 July 2017
Neutral Citation[2017] UKUT 368 (IAC)
Date19 July 2017
CourtUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • PA v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 21 September 2018
    ...protection before making an inquiry about the applicant in the applicant's country of origin. The decision in VT (Article 22 Procedures Directive – confidentiality) Sri Lanka [2017] UKUT 00368 (IAC) is not to be read as holding to the contrary. (2) The United Kingdom's actual legal obligat......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2017-07-19, [2017] UKUT 368 (IAC) (VT (Article 22 Procedures Directive - confidentiality))
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 19 July 2017
    ...normal } Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) VT (Article 22 Procedures Directive - confidentiality) Sri Lanka [2017] UKUT 00368 (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision Promulgated On 14 March 2017 & 28 April 2017 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE O’CONNOR UPPER TRIBUN......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2019-06-24, PA/01648/2016
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 24 June 2019
    ...relied upon was not genuine, albeit for the reasons set out in VT (Article 22 Procedures Directive – confidentiality) Sri Lanka [2017] UKUT 00368 (IAC), little weight is attached to this document and the Respondent has not placed any recent reliance upon The Appellant relies on the opinion ......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2019-02-08, PA/09602/2017
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 8 February 2019
    ...there is “no general duty of enquiry…to authenticate documents produced in support of a protection claim” (see VT Sri Lanka [2017] UKUT 00368) (IAC)). In the leading Strasbourg case of Singh and Others v Belgium [2011] ECHR 33210/11, the relevant documents emanated from the UNHCR and enquir......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT