Wakelin v London and South-Western Railway Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Year | 1865 |
| Date | 1865 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
123 cases
- Gee Hup & Company v Yeo Swee Hern trading as Chop Yong Bee Huat
-
Logan v O'Donnell
... ... The Irish decision, Scott v.Dublin & Wicklow Railway Co. (1) , has been recently given a wider authority by the ... London and North-Western Railway Company (1) , in the House of ... the language of some of the Lords in the case of Wakelin v. London & South Western Railway Co. (1) , but it has no ... ...
- Chen Soon Lee v Chong Voon Pin and Others
-
Brown (Purcell) v Church of God & Saints of Christ
...great object. viz. abstaining from expressing any opinion upon the merits of the case until the hearing": Walker v. Duke of Buccleugh (1865) 12 L.T. 628, 629. So unless the material available to the court at the hearing of the application for an interlocutory injunction fails to disclose th......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
The Mareva journey - from the atlantic to the Caribbean
...establishment by the plaintiff of his right and that the lesser burden of showing an arguable case to be tried applied to the alleged 32 (1865) 12 LT 628, al 629. 33 Preston v. Luck (1884) 27 Ch.D. 497 per Cotton L.J., at 506 per Cotton L.J. 34 Smith v. Grigg Ltd. [1924] 1 K.B., at 659, per......
-
Introduction
...Stevens (n 63) 253–54. 70 See, eg, W Schofield, ‘Davies v Mann: Theory of Contributory Negligence’ (1890) 3 Harv L Rev 263, 271. 71 (1886) 12 App Cas 41 (HL) 72 See, eg, Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42, [2017] AC 467 [96]–[97]. Regarding the connection between the defence of illegality and t......
-
Table of Cases
...Waite v North Eastern Railway Co (1858) El Bl & El 719, 120 ER 679 (Exch Ch)����������������������3.63 Wakelin v London & South Western Railway Co (1886) 12 App Cas 41 (HL)�������������������1.19, 6.09 Walker v Newham LBC [2002] CLY 3256 (Central London CC)������������������������������......
