Walker v Wilsher

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1889
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
100 cases
1 firm's commentaries
  • Check Your Privilege In Settlement Discussions – WP Or Not WP, That Is The Question…
    • Cayman Islands
    • Mondaq Cayman Islands
    • 6 Abril 2020
    ...Taxes Further developments in legal privilege: lessons for Jersey At A Glance Guide to Legal Privilege and Investigations Footnotes 1 (1889) 23 QBD 335 2 Tomlin v Standard Telephones and Cables Ltd [1969] 3 All ER 201 3 Paragraph 36 4 Paragraph 43 5 Paragraph 45 6 Paragraph 46 7 Paragraph 4......
5 books & journal articles
  • Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 Abril 2020
    ...except as to costs” will have the efect of lifting the privilege as between the parties to the settlement agreement: Walker v Wilsher (1889) 23 QBD 335; Baris Ltd v Kajima Construction Europe (UK) Ltd [2006] EWHC 31 (TCC) at [11], per HHJ Coulson QC. Yet the privilege is only lifted in resp......
  • Australia
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Obtaining Discovery Abroad. Third Edition
    • 8 Diciembre 2020
    ...Act 1995 (Cth) s 130(3). 79 . Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 130(4). 80 . Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 131. 81 . See e.g., Walker v Wilsher (1889) 23 QBD 335 at 337–38, cited in Halsbury's Laws of Australia at [325-6705]; Re Turf Enters. Pty Ltd. [1975] Qd R 266 at 267; Kong v Kang & Ors [2014] VSC......
  • THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” RULE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2003, December 2003
    • 1 Diciembre 2003
    ...document will lose its sting as a privileged document because its purpose is now complete and at an end.” 10 Supra note 6, at 1300. 11 (1889) 23 QBD 335. 12 Ibid, at 337. 13 [1969] 1 WLR 1378. Followed by the Malaysian High Court in Aluminium Industries Sdn Bhd v Cookermate (M) Sdn Bhd[1990......
  • OF PRICE AND PREJUDICE, WAR AND PEACE — THE USE OF “WITHOUT PREJUDICE”CORRESPONDENCE IN APPLICATIONS FOR STRIKING OUT AN ACTION FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1994, December 1994
    • 1 Diciembre 1994
    ...first referred to the general “without prejudice” rule and stated that:— “To the general rule there are exceptions. In Walker v Wilsher(1889) 23 QBD 335 at 338 Lindley LJ referred to letters written without prejudice being considered in a case in which a question of laches was raised and, a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT