Walker v Wilsher
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1889 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
100 cases
-
Oliver Alfred Sidney Cutts (Appellant (Plaintiff) v Albert Head and Another (Respondents
...proceedings relating to finance". 24 What Mr. Leckie particularly relies on, however, is the decision of this court in Walker v. Wilsher 23 Q.B.D. 335. This was an appeal from Baron Huddleston, who had, on the question of costs, after trial looked at some "without prejudice" correspondence ......
-
A-B Chew Investments Pte Ltd v Lim Tjoen Kong
...procedure have to be taken.I should, though the case is not directly material to the facts before me, refer to Walker v Wilsher (1889) 23 QBD 335 which decided that `without prejudice` communications should not be looked at by a court without the consent of both parties. It was a case of a ......
- Smith Martis Cork & Rajan Pty Ltd v Benjamin Corporation Pty Ltd
- Associated Wood Ind Sdn Bhd; Oh Kuang Liang
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Check Your Privilege In Settlement Discussions WP Or Not WP, That Is The Question
...Taxes Further developments in legal privilege: lessons for Jersey At A Glance Guide to Legal Privilege and Investigations Footnotes 1 (1889) 23 QBD 335 2 Tomlin v Standard Telephones and Cables Ltd [1969] 3 All ER 201 3 Paragraph 36 4 Paragraph 43 5 Paragraph 45 6 Paragraph 46 7 Paragraph 4......
5 books & journal articles
-
Litigation
...except as to costs” will have the efect of lifting the privilege as between the parties to the settlement agreement: Walker v Wilsher (1889) 23 QBD 335; Baris Ltd v Kajima Construction Europe (UK) Ltd [2006] EWHC 31 (TCC) at [11], per HHJ Coulson QC. Yet the privilege is only lifted in resp......
-
Australia
...Act 1995 (Cth) s 130(3). 79 . Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 130(4). 80 . Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 131. 81 . See e.g., Walker v Wilsher (1889) 23 QBD 335 at 337–38, cited in Halsbury's Laws of Australia at [325-6705]; Re Turf Enters. Pty Ltd. [1975] Qd R 266 at 267; Kong v Kang & Ors [2014] VSC......
-
THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” RULE
...document will lose its sting as a privileged document because its purpose is now complete and at an end.” 10 Supra note 6, at 1300. 11 (1889) 23 QBD 335. 12 Ibid, at 337. 13 [1969] 1 WLR 1378. Followed by the Malaysian High Court in Aluminium Industries Sdn Bhd v Cookermate (M) Sdn Bhd[1990......
-
OF PRICE AND PREJUDICE, WAR AND PEACE — THE USE OF “WITHOUT PREJUDICE”CORRESPONDENCE IN APPLICATIONS FOR STRIKING OUT AN ACTION FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
...first referred to the general “without prejudice” rule and stated that:— “To the general rule there are exceptions. In Walker v Wilsher(1889) 23 QBD 335 at 338 Lindley LJ referred to letters written without prejudice being considered in a case in which a question of laches was raised and, a......
Request a trial to view additional results