Walridge against Kennison Et Alt
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1793 |
| Date | 01 January 1793 |
| Court | High Court |
English Reports Citation: 170 E.R. 306
IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH AND COMMON PLEAS.
Walridge against Kennison Et Alt
Monday, June 9th waldridge agmnsi kennison et alt. (An admission of a hand-writing made by the defendant, pending a treaty for compromising the suit, is evidence against him.) Case on a bill of exchange against the defendants as joint acceptors. Plea of the general issue. The hand-writing of one of the defendants was regularly proved The proof as to Kenmson, the other defendant, was thus, that the cause having been entered, and standing for trial...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
11 cases
-
Ofulue and Another v Bossert
... ... the protection that the rule gives in without prejudice negotiations to an admission against interest extends to an acknowledgment of what at the time it was made was an agreed fact ... After referring to Waldridge v Kennison (1794) 1 Esp 142 with some lack of enthusiasm Lord Griffiths then said that "If ... ...
-
Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council
... ... in order to resolve the deadlock Rush and Tompkins commenced proceedings in August 1979 against the G.L.C. as first defendant and Careys as second defendant in which they claimed an inquiry into ... Kennison (1794) 1 Esp. 142 ... I regard this as an exceptional case and it should not be allowed to whittle ... ...
-
AAG Investments Ltd v BAA Airports Ltd
...“ admission” is given a substantially wider meaning than it usually has in the law of evidence. (I disregard the old case of Waldridge v. Kennison (1794) 1 Esp. 143, which Lord Griffiths in the Rush & Tompkins case [1989] A.C. 1280, 1300, regarded as exceptional.) Conversely, however, I......
-
Christopher James Briggs and Others v Alexander Clay
...for a settlement. Thus an admission that a document was in the handwriting of one of the parties was received in evidence in Waldridge v. Kennison (1794) 1 Esp. 142. I regard this as an exceptional case and it should not be allowed to whittle down the protection given to the parties to spea......
Get Started for Free