Walsh v Lonsdale
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1875 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
48 cases
-
Decision Nº ACQ 452 2009. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 06-10-2015
...Ch App 548 Worboys v Carter [1987] 2 EGLR 1 (CA) Lyon v Reed [1844] 13 M&W 285 Holme v Brunskill [1878] 3 QBD 495 Walsh v Lonsdale (1882) LR 21 Ch D9 INTERIM DECISION Introduction These three references concern the compulsory purchase of the properties known as 15 Waterloo Street, and 1 and......
-
Decision Nº ACQ 26 2007. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 09-04-2010
...LBC (1971) 22 P & CR 922 Pointe Gourde Quarrying & Transport Co Ltd v Sub-Intendent of Crown Lands [1947] AC 565 Walsh v Lonsdale [1882] LR 21 Ch D 9 R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Van Goetz [1999] QB 1019 DECISION Introduction This is a decision to determine the compensation payable to Mr Tere......
-
Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake v Duncan Kenric Swift (as trustee of the estates of Nihal Brake and Andrew Brake)
...special kind, so that you cannot rely on this trust to avoid contractual obligations: cf Ezair v Conn, above). And, in Walsh v Lonsdale (1882) 21 Ch D 9, the Court of Appeal treated a contract for a lease which had been implemented (by taking possession and paying rent, but not actually gra......
-
Kingswood Estate Company Ltd v Anderson
...been put forward that the learned County Court Judge would have had no jurisdiction to apply the equitable principle of Walsh v. Lonsdale, 21 Ch. D., 9., in order to find such an agreement, seeing that the value of the property in question here exceeded the County Court limit of 13With rega......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
The Law Of Distraint Under A Commercial Lease In Ontario
...remedy of distraint is "the seizure of someone's property in order to obtain payment of rent or other money owed" (Walsh v Lonsdale (1882), 21 Ch. D. 9 (Eng. C.A.). In a situation where a commercial tenant has defaulted on its rent, the remedy of distraint allows the landlord to seize, take......
-
The Law Of Distraint Under A Commercial Lease In Ontario
...remedy of distraint is "the seizure of someone's property in order to obtain payment of rent or other money owed" (Walsh v Lonsdale (1882), 21 Ch. D. 9 (Eng. C.A.). In a situation where a commercial tenant has defaulted on its rent, the remedy of distraint allows the landlord to seize, take......
12 books & journal articles
-
Contract Law
...(see also infra, para 9.95, with regard to “Remedies”), where the doctrine, embodied in the leading English decision of Walsh v Lonsdale(1882) 21 Ch D 9, which allows the finding of an equitable lease, was applied — particularly in the light of the fact that the main provision in question (......
-
Preliminary Sections
...377 Wallerstein v. Moir (1974) 1 W.L.R. 991 at 1002. ............................................... 473 Walsh v. Lonsdale, 21 Ch.D. 9. ............................................................................ 433 Walton v. R. (1978) 66. C.A.R 25. ..........2 Warner v. Sampson (1959) 1 Q......
-
Sources of Rights
...on the purchaser an interest in land.” 202 199 [2004] UKHL 25, [2004] 1 WLR 1409 at para 32. 200 2007 ABCA 372. 201 Walsh v Lonsdale (1882), 21 Ch D 9 (CA); R (Von Goetz) v Tower Hamlets LBC , [1998] EWCA Civ 1507, [1999] QB 1019. 202 Alberta Law Reform Institute, Contracts for the Sale and......
-
Table of Cases
...92, 93 Wallbridge Estate, 2010 ONSC 3409 .................................................................. 193 Walsh v Lonsdale (1882), 21 Ch D 9 (CA) ......................................................... 221 Walshe v Citizens Bank of Canada (2003), 63 OR (3d) 702 (SC) ......................
Request a trial to view additional results