Walsham v Walsham
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1949 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Sheldon v Sheldon
...thereby depriving his wife of the chance of having a child, see White v. White, 1948 Probate, p. 330:Walsham v. Walsham, 1949 Probate, p. 350; Cafkett v. Cafkett, 1950 Probate, p. 253;Knott v. Knott, 1953 Probate, p. 249. And when a husband, without his wife's consent, got himself steril......
-
Scott v Scott
...3 1931 S. C. 547. 4 1950 S. C. 227. 5 1953 S. C. 312. 6 Reference was made to Squire v. SquireELR, [1949] P. 51; Walsham v. WalshamELR, [1949] P. 350;Kaslefsky v. KaslefskyELR, [1951] P. 38; Simpson v. SimpsonELR, [1951] P. 320; Forbes v. ForbesELR,[1956] P. 16; Waters v. WatersELR, [1956] ......
- Evans v Evans
-
Augustin Malaykhan Petitioner/Respondent v Prescilia Malaykhan Respondent/Petitioner [ECSC]
...Court and certainly cannot be tantamount to cruelty. The cases cited in support of his proposition namely Knot v Knot [1953] 2AER 305, Walsham v Walsham [1949] 1 AER 774–775 and Rushton v Rushton [1969] 2 DLR can readily be distinguished from the more recent authorities of Mouncer v Mouncer......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The Far East and United States Policy: a Re-Examination
...1949), pp. 10-11, 16-18. Compare also the official reply to certain critics, in Depart- ment of State Bulletin, Vol. XXI (September 5, 1949), pp. 350-352. 9 The writer is aware of the controversial nature of the term "democracy." In the present it is arbitrarily used to mean government in w......