Walter Parker port Replevin envers Nicholas Francis ou le Defendant fist avowry

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Common Pleas
Judgment Date01 January 1664
Date01 January 1664

English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 352


Walter Parker port Replevin envers Nicholas Francis ou le Defendant fist avowry

CXXXIII. Walter Parker port Replevin envera Nicholas Francis ou le Defendant fist avowry pur c ^ Ro. Smith fuit seisi de &c, & eux tenoit de John Bevil come de son Manner de Kehgath per homage fealty & escuage & suit al Court &c. des queux services le dit John Bevil fuit seisi per les mains le dit Ro. Smith come per les mains son veraye Tenant a qje plaintiff per protestation nient conusant le tenure pur plee dit a le dit John Bevil ne unques fuit seisi des dits services per les mains le dit Robert Smith come per les mains de son veraye Tenant, & sur c issue fuit prise sur a special Verdit fuit trove, scilicet q, le dit Robert Smith tenoit les Tenements avandits de le dit John Bevil come de son Mannor avandit, & qje dit [58] John Bevil fuit seisi del fealty & suit del Court tantum parcel de les services avandits per les mains le dit Robert Smith, mes si soit seisin de touts les services ou nemy ils ne scaye &c. Sur quel Verdit Jugement fuit done pur le avowant ; car auterraent est grande inconvenience ò ear possibility poit fair ^ un ne aver seisin de touts les services deins 100. ans &c' Car homage nest de estre fait mes per Tenant in fee ou estate d'enheritance, & eseuage nest annuelment de estre paye pur q^ reason serra q, seisin de part de les services' serra seisin de touts come en divers auters des Cases seisin de part est seisin de tout & especialment quant le tenure est trove. Et Nota q, le issue icy nest general issue mes issue join sur especial matter per un negative, & nest sur aseun matter contenu en le Declaration, &amp...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Quinn v Financial Services Ombudsman
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 29 Julio 2016
    ...A number of observations can perhaps be made about Finnegan P.'s judgment inUlster Bank. 13 First, Finnegan P. considers only ss. 57CK, 57CL and 57CM of the Act of 1942. There is no consideration of s.57BX and no consideration why the Oireachtas would wish to establish a two-tier system whi......
  • Keaney v Sullivan and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 19 Diciembre 2008
    ...for damages for breach of contract in respect of the alleged agreements of 2000 in relation to the matters pleaded in paragraphs 27, 32(i) and 57 concerning the discharge of debts of Pollyexfen Design Limited. No substantive objection was made to this claim. 135 b b. The claim in relation t......
  • Christopher Wheatley First Claimant Hazel Wheatley Second Claimant v Waterpoint Caribbean Homes Ltd Defendant [ECSC]
    • Caribbean Community
    • Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court
    • 9 Marzo 2011
    ...plumb, the connection of the beams is off at the top of the column. (f) The reinforcement extending from the RC column (along gridlines A3 and 57) into the beam is exposed. Photograph 5 shows the exposed reinforcing bars which have now started to corrode." 77 The report further states ......
  • Mcnamara and Ors v Auckland City Council
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 9 Mayo 2012
    ...105 at [85]–[88]. 44 S ections 56(1)(b) and 56(1)(c). 45 Section 57(3)(a). 46 Building Regulations 1992 , reg 8(1). 47 Sections 57(3)(b)(i) and 57(3)(c). 48 Section 49 Section 57(4). 50 Section 56. 51 Section 56(1)(b). 52 Third Amended Statement of Claim, dated 16 February 2009, at [5.10]. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT