Walters v Lunt

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1951
Year1951
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Director of Public Prosecutions v Gomez
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 3 décembre 1992
    ...as the dishonest appropriation by a parent of things taken and brought home by a child under the age of criminal responsibility (cf. Walters v. Lunt (1951), 35 Cr. App. R. 94). The expression 'dishonestly appropriates' in clause 1(1) means the same as 'fraudulently converts to his own use o......
  • O'Leary v Cunningham
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 28 juillet 1980
    ...3 R. v. Coggins (1873) 12 Cox C.C. 517. 4 R. v. Perkins (1852) 2 Den. 459. 5 R. v. Christ (1951) 35 Cr. App. R. 76. 6 Walters v. Lunt [1951] 2 All E.R. 645. 7 The Attorney General (Lambe) v. Fitzgerald [1973] I.R. 195. 8 The State (McLoughlin) v. Shannon [1948] I.R. 439. 9 The State (Attorn......
  • DPP v Fowler
    • Ireland
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 24 février 1995
    ...(1822) 5 Barn. & Ald. 926. R. v. Shelton (1986) 83 Cr. App. R. 379. Stapylton v. O'Callaghan [1973] 2 All E.R. 782. Walters v. Lunt [1951] 2 All E.R. 645. Criminal law - Indictment - Alternative counts - Whether desirable for both counts to go to jury if supported by evidence - Whether with......
  • John Rodney Cogan ; Michael Edward Leak
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 9 juin 1975
    ...way of aiding and abetting". 12 The only case which Mr. Herrod submitted had a direct bearing upon the problem of Leak's guilt was Walters v. Lunt and another, (1951) 2 All England Reports 645. In that case the respondents had been charged under the Larceny Act, 1916, section 33(1) with re......
1 books & journal articles
  • The death penalty under the laws of Malawi and the law of human rights
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Malawi Law Journal No. 3-1, January 2009
    • 1 janvier 2009
    ...that persons below seven years are not responsible for their acts oromissions. See sec 14 of the Penal Code. See also Walters v Lunt [1951] 2 ALL ER 645, where thecourt dismissed the charge of receiving stolen property because the tricycle that was received wasallegedly taken by a person be......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT