Warner Brothers Pictures, Incorporated v Nelson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1936
Year1936
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
50 cases
  • Eastham v Newcastle United Football Club Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Warren v Mendy
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 14 February 1989
    ...we would respectfully think ought to cause the Board concern. They may well wish to consider whether the regulationsWarner Brothers Pictures Inc. v. Nelson [1937] 1 K.B. 209 (film producer and actress), where injunctions were granted, and Page One Records Ltd. v. Britton [1968] 1 W.L.R. 157......
  • Evening Standard Company Ltd v Henderson
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 November 1986
    ...give me a moment's pause was the Court of Appeal decision of Whitwood Chemical Co. v. Hardman (1891) 2 Ch. 416Warner Brothers Pictures, Incorporated v. Nelson (1937) 1 K.B. 209. 12 The plaintiffs had to consider carefully what they should do. They decided that one way out of their problem w......
  • Evans Marshall & Company Ltd v Bertola S.A.
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 December 1972
    ...the facts so far as they appear from the affidavits here, and the authorities, particularly that of Decro-Wall and that of Warner Bros. v. NelsonPartnership Act, 1890, leans against a dissolution at the instance of the miscomputing party, party for example, the powers given to the Court to ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • What's Mine Is Yours
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 24 September 2015
    ...to transfer. Courts have historically barred the transfer of contracts that are of a personal nature (Warner Bros Pictures v Nelson, [1936] 3 All ER 160). This makes for potential complexity and increased risk in the event of a change of ownership. Further, many of the industries where thes......
20 books & journal articles
  • Illegality
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Vitiating Factors
    • 4 August 2020
    ...may be diff‌icult to draw. In Herbert Morris Ltd v Saxelby , 157 for exam- 153 Ibid at 924. 154 Warner Bros Pictures Inc v Nelson , [1937] 1 KB 209. This point cannot be generalized beyond the employment context, however, as it is clearly established that in other kinds of relationships, su......
  • Specific Performance and Injunctions
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Remedies
    • 4 August 2020
    ...of activity, though not as remuneratively as in her special line. She will not be driven, although she may be tempted to perform 186 [1937] 1 KB 209 [ Warner Bros ]. 187 Ibid at 213. 188 Ibid . 189 Ibid at 217. 190 Ibid at 219. THE LAW OF CONTR ACTS 1130 the contract, and the fact that she ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • 18 November 2023
    ...FC 53 ............................................................................ 224 Warner Brothers Pictures Inc v Nelson (1936), [1937] 1 KB 209, [1936] 3 All ER 160, 155 LT 538 ......................................................... 428, 579 Warren v Mendy, [1989] 1 WLR 853, [1989] 3......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Equitable Remedies. Second Edition
    • 18 June 2013
    ...(C.A.) ......................................................................... 340 Warner Brothers Pictures Inc. v. Nelson (1936), [1937] 1 K.B. 209, [1936] 3 All E.R. 160, 155 L.T. 538.......................................310, 420, 423 Warren v. Mendy, [1989] 1 W.L.R. 853, [1989] 3 All ......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT