Watkins v Naval Colliery Company (1897)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1912 |
| Year | 1912 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
22 cases
-
Mackey v James Henry Monks (Preston) Ltd
...(2) [1901] 1 Q. B. 20. (1) [1911] 2 I. R., at p. 352. (1) [1903] 1 K. B. 890. (2) [1901] 1 Q. B. 780. (3) [1915] A. C., at p. 738. (1) [1912] A. C. 693. (2) 29 T. L. R. 425. (3) [1915] 2 K. B. 768. (4) [1900] 2 I. R. 391. (5) [1915] 2 I. R. 128. (6) [1912] A. C., at pp. 703, 706, 707. (7) [......
-
Lochgelly Iron and Coal Company v McMullan
...by a breach of such duty. Britannic Merthyr Coal Co. v. David, 1910, A.C. 94, Butler v. Fife Coal Co., Ltd., 1912, A.C. 149, Watkins v. Naval Colliery Co. (1897), Ltd., ibid. p. 693, to cite only three cases decided by your Lordships' House. And in an action founded on a breach of such a d......
-
Harrison v National Coal Board
...the Regulations. If he was absolutely liable judgment should have been given in the Plaintiff's favour. Lord Haldane in Watkins v. Naval Colliery Coy. Ltd. [1912] A.C. 693 at p. 703 explains the order for a new trial on the ground that that was all that was asked. I have examined the recor......
-
Park v Wilsons and Clyde Coal Company Haggerty v Wilsons and Clyde Coal Company
...41–43, [1912] A. C. 149; David v. Britannic Merthyr Coal Co.ELR, [1909] 2 K. B. 146; Watkins v. Naval Colliery Co.ELR (1897), Limited, [1912] A. C. 693; Bett v. Dalmeny Oil Co.SC, (1905) 7 F. 787; Connell v. James Nimmo & Co.ELR, 1923 S. C. 737, 1924 S. C. (H. L.) 84, [1924] A. C. 1 [1911] ......
Request a trial to view additional results