Webber v Carey ; DPP v Carey

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Date1969
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
37 cases
  • Walker v Lovell (on Appeal from a Divisional Court of the Queen's Bench Division)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 16 July 1975
    ...Holah [1973] 1 All E.R. 106 and accords with the guidance which this House gave obiter in a passage in my own speech in Webber v. Carey [1970] A.C. 1072 at p. 1096, with which my noble and learned friends Lords Hodson, Pearson and Wilberforce expressed their 6The ground of acquittal on the......
  • DPP v Kay
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 13 April 1998
  • R v Littell
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 6 March 1981
    ...for providing a specimen of breath does not of itself invalidate the test if the test result is positive. See D.P.P. v. Carey (1970) A.C. 1072, R. v. Holah (1973) 1 W.L.R. 127, Walker v. Lovell (1975) 1 W.L.R. 1141 and Attorney-General's Reference No. 1 of 1978 (1978) 67 Cr. App. R. 387. 12......
  • Corporation v Dalton
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Preliminary Sections
    • 29 August 2015
    ...EWHC 559 (Admin)! 156 ............................................. Carberry v Bettinson, unreported, CO/902/85, DC! 112 Carey, DPP v [1970] AC 1072, [1969] 3 WLR 1169, [1969] 3 All ER 1662, ................................................................. ! [1970] RTR 14, HL! 4, 16, 63 , 2......
  • The Requirement to Provide Specimens
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Contents
    • 29 August 2015
    ...2, and on the procedure for taking and dividing specimens, Chapter 3. For cases concerning hospital patients, see page 88. DPP v Carey [1970] AC 1072, [1969] 3 WLR 1169, [1969] 3 All ER 1662, [1970] RTR 14, 10 and 11 November 1969 and 3 December 1969, HL The off‌icer’s failure to follow the......
  • Divisional Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 63-4, August 1999
    • 1 August 1999
    ...were inerrorin appealing to s 78 ofPACEas aground for exercising their discretion to exclude the evidence.COMMENTARYIn DPP vCarey[1970] AC 1072,theHouse of Lords heldthatthemanufacturers' instructions suppliedwitha device approved bytheHome Secretary didnotform part of the device approved b......
  • Divisional Courts
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 39-2, April 1975
    • 1 April 1975
    ...as duringorimmediatelypriortothetest',andthat,ifthemanufacturers'instructionswerenotfollowed,thetestwas vitiated. Webber v. Carey(1970A.C.1072)decidedthatnon-compliancewiththemanufacturersinstructionsdidnotofitselfnullifythetest.HisLordshipthenwentontoconsiderDarnell v. Portal(1972R.T.R.483......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT