Webster v James Chapman & Company (A Firm)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Year | 1989 |
| Date | 1989 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
24 cases
-
Gelatissimo Ventures (S) Pte Ltd v Singapore Flyer Pte Ltd
...20 Counsel for the defendant had relied on the case of Calcraft v Guest (supra 10) as well as Webster v James Chapman & Co (a firm) [1989] 3 All ER 939 to support his argument that even if the information contained in the email thread was privileged, secondary evidence of that communication......
-
Telesystem Intl Wireless Inc. v CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners LP
...E.R. 236. (9) Waugh v. British Rys. Bd., [1974] A.C. 405; [1973] 2 All E.R. 1169, applied. (10) Webster v. James Chapman & Co. Ltd., [1989] 3 All E.R. 939, applied. (11) Wisniewski v. Central Manchester Health Auth., [1998] Lloyds Rep. Med. 223; [1998] P.I.Q.R. P324, considered. Attorneys-a......
-
JP Morgan Multi-Strategy Fund LP v Macro Fund Ltd
...v. BakerELR, [1998] Ch. 356; sub nom. Barings plc., Re, UNK[1998] 1 All E.R. 673, referred to. (43) Webster v. James Chapman & Co., [1989] 3 All E.R. 939, considered. (44) Wentworth v. Lloyd(1864), 10 H.L. Cas. 589; 11 E.R. 1154, dicta of Lord Chelmsford considered. Attorneys-at-Law-profess......
-
ISTIL Group Inc. v Zahoor
...confidence in iniquity, and a public interest in the court not being misled. 46 At the hearing the defendants relied on Webster v. James Chapman & Co [1989] 3 All ER 940, a decision of Scott J, for the proposition that the court conducts a balancing exercise where privileged documents come ......
Get Started for Free
