Wedderburn v Wedderburn
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
| Judgment Date | 11 March 1854 |
| Date | 11 March 1854 |
English Reports Citation: 52 E.R. 183
ROLLS COURT.
UBEAV.68. WEDDERBURN V. WEDDERBUEN 183 [465] wedderbubn v. wedderbubn. March 11, 1854. Application to remove into Judge's Chambers a reference, which had been seventeen years in the Master's office, refused. By the decree made in 1836 (see 2 Keen, 752; 4 Myl. & Cr. 53), it was referred to the Master to take the usual accounts of the testator's estate, and of the partnership dealings, and to ascertain the value of the testator's interest in the firm in May 1801, and to take an account of the profits made by the successive partnerships, and ascertain what sums had been taken out of the concern for the testator's estate, and the capitals of the successive partners, with liberty to state special circumstances. The Master made a report in 1846, on the matters referred to him, except the administration accounts of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Patley Wood Farm LLP v Kristina Kicks
... ... […] The rule is clearly stated in Wedderburn v Wedderburn , where Sir John Romilly M.R. said [ (1853) 17 Beav 158, 159 ]: ‘Mr. and Mrs. Hawkins may, in concurrence with the ... ...
-
Wedderburn v Wedderburn
...17 Beav. 158S. C. 2 Keen, 722; 8 L. J. Ch. (N. S.), 177; 3 Jur. (O. S.), 596. For subsequent proceedings, see 2 Beav. 208; 17 Beav. 158; 18 Beav. 465; 22 Beav. 84. As to the position of executors dealing with trust money in business, see Turner v. Trelawny, 1841, 12 Sim. 61; Lord Provost: o......