A well-tailored centrality measure for evaluating patents and their citations

Publication Date08 July 2019
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2018-0168
Pages750-772
AuthorClaudia Donato,Paolo Lo Giudice,Roberta Marretta,Domenico Ursino,Luca Virgili
SubjectLibrary & information science
A well-tailored centrality
measure for evaluating patents
and their citations
Claudia Donato
Avanade, Milan, Italy
Paolo Lo Giudice
University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy
Roberta Marretta
Accenture, Milan, Italy, and
Domenico Ursino and Luca Virgili
Department of Information Engineering,
Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
Abstract
Purpose The development of innovations in all the research and development (R&D) fields is
leading to a huge increase of patent data. Therefore, it is reasonable to foresee that, in the next future, Big
Data-centered techniques will be compulsory to fully exploit the potential of this kind of data. In this context,
network analysis-based approaches are extremely promising. The purpose of this paper is to provide a
contribution to this setting. In fact, the authors propose a well-tailored centrality measure for evaluating
patents and their citations.
Design/methodology/approach The authors preliminaril y introduce a suitable s upport directed
network representing patents and their citations. After this, the authors present the centrality measures,
namely, Naive Patent Deg reeand Refined Patent Degree.’”Then, the authors show why they are well
tailored to capture the s pecificities of the patent scenari o and why classical centrality measu re fails to fully
reach this purpose.
Findings The authors present th ree possible applicatio ns of the measures, namel y: the computation
of a patent scopeallowing the evaluatio n of the width and the strength of the influen ce of a patent on a
given R&D field; the comp utation of a patent lifecycle; and the detec tion of the so-called power patents,
i.e., the most relevant paten ts, and the investigatio n of the importance, for a pa tent, to be cited by a
power patent.
Originality/value None of the approaches proposing the application of centrality measures to patent
citation networks consider the main peculiarity of this scenario, i.e., that, if a patent p
i
cites a patent p
j
, then
the value of p
i
decreases. So, differently from classical scientific paper citation scenario, in this one performing
a citation has a cost for the citing entity. This fact is not considered by all the approaches conceived to
investigate paper citations. Nevertheless, this feature represents the core of patent citation scenario. The
approach has been explicitly conceived to capture this feature.
Keywords Centrality measures, Naive Patent Degree, Network-based analysis, Patent analysis,
Patent lifecycle, Patent scope, Power patents, Refined Patent Degree
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
Patents have been largely investigated in the past scientific literature (Abbas et al., 2014; Ejermo
and Karlsson, 2006; Lanjouw and Schankerman, 2004; Lubango, 2015; Sternitzke et al., 2008;
Wagner and Leydesdorff, 2005). In fact, their analysis can supply a large amount of information
concerning both the state-of-art and the protagonists of a certain research and
development (R&D) field (Fontana et al., 2013; Guellec and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, 2001;
Hingley and Bas, 2009; Hsueh and Wang, 2009; Lo Giudice et al., 2018; Miguélez and Moreno,
2013; Singh, 2008; World Intellectual Property Organization, 2009). This is also because the
submission of a patent is usually the first public claim of a new invention or innovation. Patent
Journal of Documentation
Vol. 75 No. 4, 2019
pp. 750-772
© Emerald PublishingLimited
0022-0418
DOI 10.1108/JD-10-2018-0168
Received 24 October 2018
Revised 12 February 2019
Accepted 17 February 2019
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
www.emeraldinsight.com/0022-0418.htm
750
JD
75,4
analysis allows decision makers to investigate the experiences of other (possible competitor)
institutions and/or countries, in such a way as to know the past and the current R&D activities in
the fields of interest, to delineate their evolution and to foresee their future developments.
Furthermore, patent analysis allows the construction of a detailed picture of the R&D
cooperations among different institutions and/or countries and can be an indicator of geo-
political evolutions happening all over the world (Bornmann and Daniel, 2008; Cooke and Hall,
2013; Shen et al., 2017).
Most of the past approaches for patent analysis were based on classical statistics.
However, the impressive development of innovations in all the R&D fields is leading to a
huge increase of patent data. Therefore, it is reasonable to foresee that, in the next future,
Big Data-centered techniques will be compulsory to fully exploit the potential of patent data.
In this last scenario, the adoption of approaches based on network analysis is extremely
promising (Cammarano et al., 2015; Clauset et al., 2004, 2009; Leicht et al., 2006; Wasserman
and Faust, 1994; Zardi et al., 2016). As a matter of facts, network analysis allows a full
comprehension and a complete management of those phenomena where relationships
among objects to investigate play the key role and, at the same time, the corresponding
variables are strictly related to each other. This is exactly the future scenario characterizing
patent and innovation management, and, at the same time, it is the worst-case scenariofor
classic statistic-based approaches, which present several limitations when operating therein
(Tsvetovat and Kouznetsov, 2011).
As a confirmation of the adequacy of network analysis for patent investigation, in
the past literature, several approaches to facing this issue can be found (see, for instance,
Cammarano et al., 2015; Ellis et al., 1978; Hu and Zhang, 2017; Hung and Wang, 2010;
Yang et al., 2015).
Centrality is one of the most investigated issues in network analysis. It aims at
measuring the importance of a node in a network. It allows experts: to measure the relevance
and the criticity of nodes in their networks; to define forms of distance between network
nodes or areas; to measure the cohesion degree of a sub-network; and to identify cohesive
sub-networks or network communities.
In the past, several centrality measures have been proposed in the literature (Brin and
Page, 1998; Chen et al., 2013; Freeman, 1977, 1979; Hage and Harary, 1995; Sabidussi, 1966;
Stephenson and Zelen, 1989). Among them, the most general and best known ones are:
degree centrality, based on the number of arcs incoming in, or outgoing from, each node;
closeness centrality, based on distances between nodes; betweenness centrality, based on
the shortest paths connecting pairs of nodes; and eigenvector centrality, based on both the
number and the centrality of nodes whose outgoing arcs are incident on the nodes of
interest. All these measures, as well as the other ones proposed in the literature, could be
adopted in the investigation of patents. However, they are not tailored to this scenario and
could return approximate results. This is because patents have a very relevant peculiarity
that is notfound elsewhere ( for instance, inscientific papers, Ferrara et al., 2018), in that, if a
patent p
i
cites a patent p
j
, then p
i
looses a part of its value.
If we report this reasoning to the network analysis context, we have that, for a node,
having incoming arcs is extremely positive, whereas having outgoing arcs is negative. Past
centrality measures certainly distinguish between these two kinds of arc; for instance,
degree centrality distinguishes between indegree and outdegree (Hanneman and Riddle,
2005). However, they do not combine centrality values originated from the incoming arcs
with those derived from the outgoing ones. What is missing is precisely a centrality measure
that first assigns a positive ranking to incoming arcs and a negative ranking to outgoing
ones and, then, combines these rankings to obtain a unique value.
In this paper, we aim at providing a contribution in this setting. In fact, we propose a
well-tailored centrality measure for evaluating patents and their citations.
751
Well-tailored
centrality
measure

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT