Wessex Dairies Ltd v Smith

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1935
Date1935

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
80 cases
  • Singapore River Cruises & Leisure Pte Ltd v Phun Teow Kie and Another
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 6 January 2000
    ...to be helpful in establishing that Phun owed the duties alleged in this case. Robb v Green [1895] 2 QB 315 and Wessex Dairies Ltd v Smith [1935] 2 KB 80 both involve existing customers of the plaintiffs. They do not relate to new business opportunities. In Industrial Development Consultants......
  • Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 5 December 1985
    ...ex-employee canvassing or doing business with customers of his former employer (see Robb v. Green [1895] 2 Q.B. 315 and Wessex Dairies Ltd. v. Smith [1935] 2 K.B. 80). (4) The implied term which imposes an obligation on the employee as to his conduct after the determination of the employmen......
  • Abdul Latif Bin Mohamed Tahiar (trading as Canary Agencies) v Saeed Husain s/o Hakim Gulam Mohiudin (trading as United Limousine)
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 31 January 2003
    ...Pernas Hotel Chain (Selangor) Bhd [1987] 1 MLJ 210 (refd) Spedding v Fitzpatrick (1888) 38 Ch D 410 (refd) Wessex Dairies Limited v Smith [1935] 2 KB 80 (folld) Andrew J Hanam (Hanam & Co) for the appellant K Anparasan (Khattar Wong & Partners) for the respondent. MPH Rubin J 1 This appeal ......
  • Allied Irish Banks Plc and Others v Diamond and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 14 October 2011
    ...J., 17th February, 2006); Vestergaard Frandsen A/S v Bestnet Europe Ltd [2009] EWHC 1456 (Ch), [2010] FSR 2 and Wessex Dairies Ld v Smith [1935] 2 KB 80 considered - Rules of the Superior Courts 1986 (SI15/1986), O 50 - Regulation (EC) No 593/2008, arts 4, 6 and 14 - Regulation (EC) No 864/......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Confidential information and departing employees - the threat from within
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 25 August 2013
    ...n 4. See also Riteway Express Pty Ltd v Clayton (1987) 10 NSWLR 238 at 240; 5 ACLC 1045. 19Above, n 4. 20 See Wessex Dairies Ltd v Smith [1935] 2 KB 80 at 21See Robb v Green [1895] 2 QB 315. 22Halliday & Nicholas Insurance Brokers Pty Ltd v Corsiatto (2001) 11 ANZ Ins Cas 61-505; [2001]......
  • When An Employee Joins The Competition
    • Ireland
    • Mondaq Ireland
    • 24 July 2013
    ...canvassing or doing business with customers of his former employer (applied Robb v Green (1895) 2 QB 315 and Wessex Dairies Ltd v Smith (1935) 2 KB 80). The Court held that the implied term continued after the determination of the employment but was more restricted in its scope than during ......