Whatman v Pearson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
| Year | 1865 |
| Date | 1865 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
7 cases
-
Feldman (Pty) Ltd v Mall
...Joel v Morrison (6 C. & p. 502); 1839 Sleath v Wilson (9 C. & P. 607); 1853, Mitchell v Crasweller (13, C.B. 237); 1868, Whatman v Pearson (3 C.P. 422); 1869, Storey v Ashton (4 Q.B. 476), 1891, Coupe Co. v Maddick (1891, 2 Q.B. 413); Watermeyer, C.J. Sanderson v Collins (1904, 1 K.B. 628);......
-
Pang Chew Kim v Wartsila Singapore Pte Ltd
...[2010] 2 SLR 1113 (folld) Shadrake Alan v AG [2011] 3 SLR 778 (refd) Storey v Ashton (1869) LR 4 QB 476 (refd) Whatman v Pearson (1868) LR 3 CP 422 (refd) Work Injury Compensation Act (Cap 354, 2009 Rev Ed) ss 3 (1) , 3 (5) (b) , 3 (6) , 29 (2A) (consd) ; ss 2 (4) ,3 (5) , 29 Interpretation......
-
Pang Chew Kim (next of kin of Poon Wai Tong, deceased) v Wartsila Singapore Pte Ltd and another
...or is conversely in the course of employment, is a matter of fact and degree (see eg Joel v Morison (1834) 6 C&P 501, Whatman v Pearson (1868) LR 3 CP 422 and Storey v Ashton (1869) LR 4 QB 476). In my view, the factual nature of the test applies equally in the context of determining whethe......
-
Ren Feng Hai v Supersonic Maintenance Services Pte and another
...or is conversely in the course of employment, is a matter of fact and degree (see eg Joel v Morison (1834) 6 C&P 501, Whatman v Pearson (1868) LR 3 CP 422 and Storey v Ashton (1869) LR 4 QB 476). In my view, the factual nature of the test applies equally in the context of determining whethe......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN SINGAPORE: THE LEGAL CHALLENGE
...doing so (Limpus v London General Omnibus Co(1862) 1 H&C 526, 158 ER 995; Betts v Nielson(1868) 3 Ch App 429 at 441; Whatman v Pearson(1868) LR 3 CP 422; Canadian Pacific Railway Co v Lockhart[1942] 2 All ER 464 (CA); LCC v Cattermoles (Garages) Ltd[1953] 2 All ER 582 (CA)). 130 Salmond and......
