Wheeldon v Burrows

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1878
Date1878
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
147 cases
  • Ashworth Williams Claimant v Royston Andrew Defendant [ECSC]
    • Dominica
    • High Court (Dominica)
    • 13 July 2013
    ...has alternative access, albeit difficult access. This is not a case of implied grant of access as in the case of Wheeldon v Burroughs (1878) 12 CHD 3. Here the claimant says that he had alternative access and began using the access over the defendant's land because it was safer and more con......
  • MCST Plan No 549 v Chew Eu Hock Construction Co Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 16 July 1998
    ......The learned trial judge answered in the affirmative. He found that the facts presented a paradigm case for the operation of the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows [1879] 12 Ch D 31 . The development plan approved in 1973 depicted the said driveway. This was repeated in the 1980 subdivision plan ......
  • J &O Operators Ltd, Beverley Wong, Eloise Mulligan and Grace Wong v Kingston & St. Andrew Corporation
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 13 June 2005
    ...right of was by the Plaintiffs Plaintiffs' attorney says, in the alternative, that the Plaintiffs are entitled to rely upon the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows [1878] 12 Ch. D. 31, to establish the grant of an easement of way The principles underlying this rule were set out in the dicta of Thesi......
  • Datin Siti Hajar v Murugasu
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1970
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Creation of Easements and Profits
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part I. Easements and profits à prendre
    • 30 August 2016
    ...common intention of the parties on a transfer of land. 10 [2005] EWCA Civ 2006, [2006] 1 P & CR 27 at [28], per Neuberger LJ. 11 (1879) 12 Ch D 31; Borman v Griffith [1930] 1 Ch 493 at 499. 12 Moncrieff v Jamieson [2007] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 752 at [113], per Lord Neuberger. granted. Th......
  • The future of prescriptive easements in Australia and England.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 31 No. 1, April 2007
    • 1 April 2007
    ...of Land Law, above n 2, 671-4; Gaunt and Morgan, above n 6, 149-54. (67) Gray and Gray, Elements of Land Law, above n 2, 678. (68) (1879) 12 Ch D 31. Under this principle an implied easement arises when a grantor owns two parcels of land and uses one of those parcels (the quasi-servient par......
  • The nature of Torrens indefeasibility: understanding the limits of personal equities.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 33 No. 1, April 2009
    • 1 April 2009
    ...Property Trust v Scots Church Development Ltd (2007) 64 ACSR 31, 40-4 (Young CJ in Eq). (23) (2006) 68 NSWLR 229, 245 (Tobias JA). (24) (1879) 12 Ch D 31. (25) See below nn 178-81 and accompanying (26) Bruce Ziff, Principles of Property Law (4th ed, 2006) 453. (27) See, eg, Butt, Land Law, ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT