Whiteways Contractors (Sussex) Ltd v Impresa Castelli Construction UK Ltd

JurisdictionScotland
Date2000
Year2000
CourtCourt of Session (Outer House)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Zvi Construction Company LLC v The University of Notre Dame (USA) in England
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • August 2, 2016
    ...authorities upon which the Judge relied for that proposition, Fastrack v. Morrison (2000) 4 BLR 168 and Whiteways Contractors (Sussex) Ltd. v. Impressa Castelli Construction UK Ltd. [2001] 75 Con LR 92, are directly in point. More important is whether on the facts of this case, it can be sa......
  • Thomas-Fredric's (Construction) Ltd v Keith Wilson
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • October 21, 2003
    ...to the short-term effect of an arbitrator's decision. 28 I do not overlook Judge Bowsher QC's decision in Whiteways Contractors (Sussex) Ltd v Impresa Castelli Construction UK Ltd, an unreported judgment of 9 August 2000, but confess to have found it of less help than the other cited cases......
  • Rupert Morgan Building Services (LLC) Ltd v Jervis and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • November 12, 2003
    ...6 Each construction has some basis in authority and learned writings. For the wide construction there is HHJ Bowsher QC in Whiteways Contractors v Impresa Castelli (2000) 16 Const. LJ 453, HHJ Humphrey Lloyd QC in KNS, HHJ Gilliland QC in ( Millers Specialist Joinery v Nobles 3rd August 200......
  • Harris Calnan Construction Company Ltd v Ridgewood Kensington Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • November 15, 2007
    ...because, in his skeleton argument, Mr. Pimlott, referred to one of the older cases on this issue, namely, Whiteways Contractors (Sussex) Ltd. -v—Impresa Castelli Construction (UK) Ltd. (2000) 16 Const.L.J., 453. That was a case in which His Honour Judge Bowsher, Q.C. concluded that, because......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT