William Harris port quare impedit v Degory Nicols pur le Esglise de Cheriton
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 355
DEL COMMON-BANK
William Harris port quare impedit
and
ers Degory Nicols pur le Esglise de Cheriton
CXXXVII. William Harris port quare impedit vera Degory Nicols pur le Esgliae de Cheriton Fitspain en quel fuit un long declaration, issue'joy n & special verdit done, quel verdit fuit pur le Plaintiff; car ne fuit aacun doute : mes in atay de jugement fuit allege que il apperoit en le declaration que un tenant in commen present son incumbent a le dit Eigliae per quel il gaina le entier patronage; car ila doietit & poient joynder & quant ne font mes sever come deuant, I'auter per ceo eat raise hors de possession, quel riient obstant jugement fuit done pur le Plaintiff; car fuit tenus que al prochein avoidance ila poient joynder & ai...
To continue reading
Request your trial
12 cases
-
R v Douglas and Others
...should have done so. 367 Thirdly, the loan application stated that Cymbis Trust owned 63 percent of the shares in Cymbis New Zealand Limited, and 63 percent of the shares in Cymbis New Zealand (No 2) Limited. It then stated that those companies owned the shares in Cymbis Australia Pty Limit......
-
Colin Wayne Hinds and Susan Joan Hinds v Horst Uellendahl, Froukje Uellendahl and Amphora Pty. Ltd [FLR]
...1 AC at p 585 of claims in personam: ‘The principle must always remain paramount that those actions which fall within the prohibition of ss62 and 63 may not be maintained.’ 31 The reference to ss62 and 63 is a reference to the Land Transfer Act 1952 (N.Z.), roughly corresponding with ss68 a......
-
County Council of the County of Wicklow v Whelan
...them to show that the various unauthorised developments features of which the council complains have been in place for more than seven years and 63 days prior to the issue of the within proceedings. 56 It is submitted Mr. Brophy in para. 5 of his first affidavit, avers that he spoke to the ......
-
[1] Marguerite Desir [2] Marguerite Desir (Qua Executrix of the Will of the late Albertha Bella Butcher) Appellants/Applicants v Sabina James Alcide Respondent [ECSC]
...He submitted that in the absence of a Notice of Change of Legal Practitioner or Notice of Appointment of Legal Practitioner as CPR 63.2 and 63.3 require to be filed, the Notice of Appeal was null and void. Mr. Theodore conceded that there was no rule in Part 63 which required that the legal......
Request a trial to view additional results