Williams v Quebrada Railway Land and Copper Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1895
Year1895
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
36 cases
  • Canada Trust Company and Others v Century Holdings Ltd and Others
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 8 July 1998
    ...being sought for the client's guidance in the commission of the fraud, even though the solicitor is ignorant of the fact. Williams v Quebrada Rly Land and cooper Co [1895] 2 ch. 751; see contra, Charlton v Coombes (1863) 4 Giff 372. The rule does not apply merely because fraud, fraudulent m......
  • Maycock v Attorney General and Another; and related appeals
    • Bahamas
    • Court of Appeal (Bahamas)
    • Invalid date
  • Kennedy v Law Society of Ireland
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 5 October 1999
    ...AG V LEEDS CORP 1929 2 CH 291 GRAY & CATHCART V PROVOST OF TRINITY COLLEGE 1910 1 IR 370 WILLIAMS V QUEBRADA RAILWAY LAND & COPPER CO 1895 2 CH 751 MURPHY V KIRWAN 1993 3 IR 501 JACKSON & POWELL ON PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE 3ED 650–1 LONDON & GENERAL BANK (NO 2), IN RE 1895 2 CH 673 KINGS......
  • Buttes Gas and Oil Company v Hammer; Buttes Gas and Oil Company v Hammer (No. 3)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 June 1980
    ... ... It was "all the territorial waters of the main land of Sharjah, all islands within the jurisdiction of the ... ...
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT