Williams v Summerfield

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1972
Year1972
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
33 cases
  • Hanahoe v Hussey
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • January 1, 1998
    ...SOUTHAMPTON CROWN COURT EX PARTE J & P 1993 CLR 962 R V SOUTHWARK CROWN COURT EX PARTE SORSKY DEFRIES 1996 CLR 195 WILLIAMS V SUMMERFIELD 1972 2 QB 512 R V LEWES CROWN COURT 1991 93 CAR 60 NIEMIETZ V GERMANY 1993 16 EHRR 97 R V CROWN COURT EX PARTE CUSTOMS & EXCISE 1989 AER 673 CONSTABULAR......
  • R v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another, ex parte Fininvest SpA and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • October 23, 1996
    ...allegedly employed in the fraud. The position here could hardly be more different from that under consideration by Lord Widgery CJ in Williams v Summerfield [1972] 2QB 512 at 518, when, with reference to section 7 of the Bankers' Books Evidence Act 1879, he suggested that the period of disc......
  • MCML Ltd (Formerly ED&F Man Capital Markets Ltd) v Southwark Crown Court
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • April 17, 2024
    ...must give the most mature and careful consideration to all the facts of the case (see amongst many instances Williams v Somerfield [1972] 2 QB 512 at 518 and Wood v North of England Magistrates' Court 2 [2009] EWHC (Admin) 3614 per Moses LJ at paragraph 29).” 150 The Court also emphasised......
  • R (S and Others) v Chief Constable of the British Transport Police and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • June 20, 2013
    ...judges should be scrupulous in discharging that responsibility". 40 This echoed the approach of Lord Widgery CJ in Williams v Somerfield [1972] 2 QB 512, at 519 who observed that: "…generations of justices have, or I would hope have, been brought up to recognise that the issue of a search ......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Divisional Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 56-1, February 1992
    • February 1, 1992
    ...indeed they have always done in relation to the samesituation under s 7 of the Bankers' Books Evidence Act 1879: cf WilliamsvSummerfield[1972]2 QB 512 with R v Maidstone CC, ex pWaitt[1988]Crim LR 384. In the present case, Bingham U spoke at length upon thedifficulty of balancing the two pu......
  • The constitutional invalidity of warrantless drugs searches in South Africa
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 91-2, June 2018
    • June 1, 2018
    ...and have enjoined magistrates to be mindful of their important responsibil-ities in this context. Thus in Williams vSummerfield [1972] 2 QB 512, for example, LordWidgery CJ commented that, ‘generations of justices have, or I would hope have beenbrought up to recognise that the issue of a se......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT