Williams v Summerfield
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1972 |
Year | 1972 |
Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
33 cases
-
Hanahoe v Hussey
...SOUTHAMPTON CROWN COURT EX PARTE J & P 1993 CLR 962 R V SOUTHWARK CROWN COURT EX PARTE SORSKY DEFRIES 1996 CLR 195 WILLIAMS V SUMMERFIELD 1972 2 QB 512 R V LEWES CROWN COURT 1991 93 CAR 60 NIEMIETZ V GERMANY 1993 16 EHRR 97 R V CROWN COURT EX PARTE CUSTOMS & EXCISE 1989 AER 673 CONSTABULAR......
-
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another, ex parte Fininvest SpA and Others
...allegedly employed in the fraud. The position here could hardly be more different from that under consideration by Lord Widgery CJ in Williams v Summerfield [1972] 2QB 512 at 518, when, with reference to section 7 of the Bankers' Books Evidence Act 1879, he suggested that the period of disc......
-
MCML Ltd (Formerly ED&F Man Capital Markets Ltd) v Southwark Crown Court
...must give the most mature and careful consideration to all the facts of the case (see amongst many instances Williams v Somerfield [1972] 2 QB 512 at 518 and Wood v North of England Magistrates' Court 2 [2009] EWHC (Admin) 3614 per Moses LJ at paragraph 29).” 150 The Court also emphasised......
-
R (S and Others) v Chief Constable of the British Transport Police and another
...judges should be scrupulous in discharging that responsibility". 40 This echoed the approach of Lord Widgery CJ in Williams v Somerfield [1972] 2 QB 512, at 519 who observed that: "…generations of justices have, or I would hope have, been brought up to recognise that the issue of a search ......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Divisional Court
...indeed they have always done in relation to the samesituation under s 7 of the Bankers' Books Evidence Act 1879: cf WilliamsvSummerfield[1972]2 QB 512 with R v Maidstone CC, ex pWaitt[1988]Crim LR 384. In the present case, Bingham U spoke at length upon thedifficulty of balancing the two pu......
-
The constitutional invalidity of warrantless drugs searches in South Africa
...and have enjoined magistrates to be mindful of their important responsibil-ities in this context. Thus in Williams vSummerfield [1972] 2 QB 512, for example, LordWidgery CJ commented that, ‘generations of justices have, or I would hope have beenbrought up to recognise that the issue of a se......