Williams v Wallis & Cox
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1914 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
41 cases
-
Trayfoot v Lock
...material evidences and in accordance with the case to which we were referred, ( Williams v. Wallace and Cox 1914, 2 King's Bench, per Mr Justice Atkin, as he then was, at page 485) that is a ground for setting aside the award of an Arbitrator. 8 Although the Registrar gave a very careful Aw......
-
Telcordia Technologies Inc v Telkom SA Ltd
...346 US 427 (1953) at 436 - 437 Williams v CIGNA Financial Advisors Inc 197 F3d 752 (5th Cir 1999) at 760 C Williams v Wallis and Cox [1914] 2 KB 478 Wilton v Gatonby 1994 (4) SA 160 (W) at 166H - 167I Wood v Gilmour (1840) 3 Menz 159 Worman v Hughes and Others 1948 (3) SA 495 (A) at 505 Yor......
-
Galway City Council v Samuel Kingston Construction Ltd and Another
...as denoting irregularity, and not any moral turpitude or anything of that sort". Similarly, Atkin J., in Williams v. Wallis and Cox [1914] 2 K.B. 478 stated, at p. 485, that the expression "does not necessarily involve personal turpitude on the part of the arbitrator" and that it "does not ......
-
Galway City Council v Samuel Kingston Construction Ltd and Another
...as denoting irregularity, and not any moral turpitude or anything of that sort". Similarly, Atkin J., in Williams v. Wallis and Cox [1914] 2 K.B. 478 stated, at p. 485, that the expression "does not necessarily involve personal turpitude on the part of the arbitrator" and that it "does not ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
K v S [2019] EWHC 2386 (Comm) Section 68, Due Process And The Exclusion Of Expert Evidence
...by reference to the quantum of the claim. Decision The judge held that K's reliance on authorities such as Williams v Wallis & Cox [1914] 2 KB 478 and Trayfoot v Lock [1957] 1 WLR 351 was "misplaced" and that section 68 had replaced the old law of misconduct, so that "section 68 is exha......