Willoughby v Eckstein
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1937 |
| Date | 1937 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
RHJ Ltd v FT Patten (Holdings) Ltd
...during the interim period and accordingly (as provided in Section 3) preclude any easement arising by prescription under the Act (see Willoughby v Eckstein [1937] Ch 167).” The judge thus drew attention pertinently to the difference between acquisition by grant at the date of the dispositio......
-
RHJ Ltd v FT Patten (Holdings) Ltd
...during the interim period and accordingly (as provided in Section 3) preclude any easement arising by prescription under the Act (see Willoughby v Eckstein [1937] Ch 167).” 12 Mr Francis fastens on that part of Lightman J's summary which speaks of “provisions designed to authorise the servi......
- Jamir Hassan v Kang Min
-
G & S Brough Ltd v Salvage Wharf Ltd and Another
...consequences to one party or the other, is not anything of that sort.” Both Lopes and Lindley LJJ agreed with that judgment. 51 In Willoughby v Eckstein [1937] 1 Ch 167 the plaintiff and defendant were the lessees of adjoining premises at Balfour Mews in Westminster. The lease to the plaint......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Meaning and Construction of Certain Restrictive Covenants which Impact on the Development and Commercial Use of Land
...matters’, New Law Journal , 12 December 2014, at 11). 75 City of London v Intercede Ltd [2005] EWHC 1691 (Ch). 76 Willoughby v Eckstein [1937] Ch 167: in this case in the lease under which the plaintiff acquired the premises rights of light or other easements over other premises were expres......