Wilson and Others against Hodges and Another
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 20 May 1802 |
| Date | 20 May 1802 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 102 E.R. 388
IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH.
Referred to, In re Paton, 1885, 53 L. T. 710.
wilson and others against hodges and another. Thursday, May 20th,'1802. Where the issue is on the life or death of a person otfce existing, the -proof lies on the party asserting the death, [Referred to, In re Paton, 1885, 53 L. T. 710.] " In debt on recognizance of bail, the breach assigned was, that Michell the principal had not paid the damages, nor rendered himself, &c. according to the form and effect of the said recognizance. Plea; that after the judgment, &c. and before the suing out the writs of scire facias, and before the return of the writ of capias ad satisfaciendum against 313] Michell upon the judgment, he Michell...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Doe dem. Knight against Nepean, Bart
...time when the Statute of Limitations is running. On the other hand, if we were, for the sake of preventing 728 GIBSON V. WINTERWilson v. Hodges (2 East, 312), where Lord Ellenborough refers to Throgmorton v. Walton (2 Roll. Rep. 461), for the same point. The presumption as to this fact has ......
-
Clarke v Davies
...P. 8 G. '2, Cas. temp. Hardwicke, 119. (i)2 1 Ro. Ab. 349, Baron and Feme, Z. pi. 2, line 19. 32 FROST V. BALK 7 TAUNT. 78Wilson v. Hodges, 2 East, 312. TTAUOT.78. CtARKE V. DA VIES 31 This principle ia supported by sound reason : it lies more immediately within the kaowledge of the wife, t......
-
Evans v Winifred Birch
...E / Company, 3 East, 192. N P. i -41* English Reports Citation: 170 E.R. 1289 IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH AND COMMON PLEAS71 *2 Vide Wilson v Hodqex, 2 East, 312 ; Williams v E / Company, 3 East, 192. N P. i -41* English Reports Citation: 170 E.R. 1289 IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH AND CO......
-
The King against The Inhabitants of Harborne
...was evidence (b) 1 Jac. 1, c. 11, s. 2 ; 9 G. 4, c. 31, s. 22. (c) 19 Car. 2, c. 6, s. 2. 212 THE KING t'. ST. JOHN'S, HACKNEYWilson v. Hodges (2 East, 312), the defendants, being sued in debt on recognizance of bail, pleaded the death of the principal before the return of the ca. sa.; and ......