Winchester v Fleming

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1957
Year1957
CourtQueen's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Pritchard v Pritchard and Sims
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 15 Julio 1966
    ...consortium of her husband; (see Best v. Samuel Fox & Company, 1952 Appeal Cases., page 716) or for harbouring her husband; (see Winchester v. Fleming, 1958 1 Queen's Bench Division, page 259). In the case of actions by the husband for enticement of his wife or harbouring her, well estab......
  • Digital Equipment Corporation v Darkcrest Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...appeal. Appeal dismissed with costs. Leave to appeal refused. Solicitors: Linklaters & Paines; Goslings. [Reported by IAN SAXTON[1957] 3 W.L.R. 1023; [1957] 3 All E.R. 711 The following additional cases provided by courtesy of counsel were cited in argument: A.E.G.-Telefunken (In re Agr......
  • Povey v Povey
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
    ...Roberts (1968) [1970] P. 1; [1968] 3 W.L.R. 1181; [1968] 3 All E.R. 479, D.C. Robertson v. Robertson (1881) 6 P.D. 119, C.A. Winchester v. Fleming [1958] 1 Q.B. 259; [1957] 3 W.L.R. 1023; [1957] 3 All E.R. 711. Young v. Bristol Aeroplane Co. Ltd. [1944] K.B. 718; [1944] 2 All E.R. 293, C.A.......
1 books & journal articles
  • Tort Litigation in the Context of Intra‐Familial Abuse
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 61-2, March 1998
    • 1 Marzo 1998
    ...up’:Heuston and Buckley, n 34 above, 349. Devlin J described the object of the action as ‘submission bystarvation’ (Winchester vFleming [1958] 1 QB 259, 266): deprived of shelter elsewhere, a wifewould be forced to return to the protection of her husband.37 Philip vSquire (1791) Peake 114.M......